You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MY LTTE on the bailout for the Big 3 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:32 PM
Original message
MY LTTE on the bailout for the Big 3
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 04:33 PM by jaksavage
Why bail out the big three?

We have been the objects of decades of advertising, legislation and even wars all unified in the mission of making us and keeping us a car and truck centered society. GM Chrysler and Ford have shaped our buying habits to suit their balance sheets.

The early 70s had introduced the tailpipe emission standards which forced the Big 3 to reduce the compression and install catalytic convertors. The result were uninspiring performance and band aid style clean technology. The mid 70s also saw the first oil price spike, which drove more customers into the arms of Asian and European manufacturers, who’s offering where higher quality, zippier and thriftier than any of the domestic products.
The late 70’s brought offerings from the big three such as the Chevette, Pinto, Capri and Omni/Horizon, inferior to their competion, the Civic, Rabbit, Corolla and the 510, in nearly every category.
By the 1980’s American cars were shrinking and Imports were growing in size as consumers drove the market, dragging the Big 3 with them. A stable fuel price and an industry friendly President allowed the Big 3 to sell mid sized cars with some of the innovation from the imports. California added its influence by demanding electric cars in the future and higher economy standards then the federal regulation. This stimulated GM to develop and fleet test an all electric vehicle. Unfortunately this program was halted and all the program cars shredded, after Californias stricter standards dropped the electric car requirement.
In the decade of the 90s having slowed the erosion of their market share, by mimicking the Asian technology, the Big 3 decided to focus on selling sports and power to a middle upper class who had found the outdoors and decided to vacation in it. This marriage of love for nature utilizing all matter of mechanized consumptive apparatus was, ironically, terrible for the earth and great for the domestic automakers.
Raging into the new Millennium we feared technological collapse, and poured millions into being prepared, to defend their lifestyle! fizzle
But a real tragedy in the form of terrorists attacking NYC, led our president to face the nation with a message of, “keep shopping”, and we complied.
This interest in being outdoorsy or outdoors capable then became a national obsession. Our nation caught a fever of extravagance, believing that the four wheel drive, leather seating for 7, DVD entertainment systems, GPS navigation and blistering acceleration where necessary elements of our daily commute. Safety and prestige were found in scale, mass and bling.$25,000 dollar tax credits were available for vehicles over 6000 lbs, to anyone with a simple business charter. Financing offers down to 0% APR and leases for people with an income but little savings. We became a Tough,Rock,Ram nation because the BIG 3 made it that way with advertising and lobbying. The campaign was so effective that Toyota and Nissan built full size road wagons, the Tundra and the Titan.

So sure were they all that oil would always be cheap and available…
It is akin to the Tobacco industry denial of cancer risk…
GM, Chrysler and Ford are all suffering from self inflicted wounds.

Why bail out the Big 3?

They failed to adapt to external forces.
They actively deny environmental hazards.
They actively woo us against our best interests.
They fail to lead us in a sustainable direction.
They obstruct clean tailpipe standards.
They have a flawed business model.

Let them be reorganized, restructured and down sized as well as properly regulated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC