You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #80: that would include NV and SC [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #60
80. that would include NV and SC
neither of which were punished. I am all for following the rules but I prefer the rules as written and as understood by the potential rule breakers. I teach for a living. Say tomorrow I decide that the first person to talk in my room shall be suspended for 10 days and sight some rule, which I am sure exists, permitting teachers to set such a punishment in 'unusual' circumstances. Just what do you think would happen? The rule as it had been enforced in every single, solitary, past instance was a loss of half of the delegates (and all supers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC