Ok, I may get yelled at... but... they need to prove Bristol is preggers...

[Rosco T.]

ok, let's stop for just a minute here....


#1 within hours of the Palin announcement, the rumors start to go national of 'mamma, mamma, who's the mamma".

#2 all the pictures of Palin/Family get scrubbed from the official sites

#3 some reasonably plausable CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence on the PLAUSIBILITY of the baby not being Palin's

#4 starts to circulate that it's been talked about in Alaska for a while now

#5 now... it's Monday morning and SEE, SEE IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN BRISTOL'S, SHE STILL PREGNANT!!!!

as the Church Lady would say... how conveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenient!


My bullshit detector is in high gear... here's my conspiracy theory...

a) Palin's baby WAS Bristol's

b) they concocted this story over the weekend to give cover.

c) Bristol is NOT pregant, and they WILL keep her so far buried under wraps that we won't see a sign of her.

d) Five months picked so it can 'prove the 1st one wasn't hers' and so they don't have to keep this going too long

e) Seven month preemies have a high survival rate.

f) Bristol will 'give birth' around october 28-nov 2 (SURPRISE!) and the only good thing to come out of this is some poor child that needs a family will be 'dropped in' as her child. Nice last minute push (no pun intended) for Grampy.. assuming that Palin is still the candidate by then...


Flame away.. but damn, this is just all too, too.... INSANE.