You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Well, read again... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well, read again...
"There is no excuse for failing to fully cooperate with this independent, bipartisan commission. We need open government and new leadership that holds itself accountable for whatever goes wrong on its watch--especially when it involves a national tragedy like 9-11. The Bush Administration should be taking the lead in cooperating--not dragging its feet.

To build a stronger and better America, we must find out what more could have and should have been done to prevent 9-11. The Bush Administration owes us the full truth and nothing but the truth. Unfortunately, they seem to be giving the Commission nothing but a stonewall."

http://www.clark04.com/press/release/141/

Not only are they covering up what really happened they tried to pin it on Iraq without any evidence, immediately after the incident.

CLARK: "There was a concerted effort during the fall of 2001, starting immediately after 9/11, to pin 9/11 and the terrorism problem on Saddam Hussein."

RUSSERT: "By who? Who did that?"

CLARK: "Well, it came from the White House, it came from people around the White House. It came from all over. I got a call on 9/11. I was on CNN, and I got a call at my home saying, 'You got to say this is connected. This is state-sponsored terrorism. This has to be connected to Saddam Hussein.' I said, 'But--I'm willing to say it, but what's your evidence?' And I never got any evidence." ---

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0306/S00320.htm

No there's something in the 911 investigation that the current Administration is trying to hide....

Dean saying 911 was unavoidable is doing nothing but making their case for them.

Want more... there's tons of info out there on this...including information on Bush's vacation intel briefs prior to 911. There was even a NewsWeek Article on it. Somebody dropped the ball on what is known as the "CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER".

IN THE NAVY THE COMMANDING OFFICER OF THE SHIP IS ALWAYS RESPONSIBLE AND AT FAULT WHEN THERE'S A MISHAP!

Tell Dean to stop playing Defensive JAG Officer for Bush's court-martial!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC