SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
and i have a 50% chance of winning the state lotto every week
it either will happen or it wont
smart money says it wont
|
| -Is there even a remote possibility that Senator Clinton can win* BEFORE August 25th? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:15 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yes! |
Bad Thoughts |
May-25-08 04:17 PM |
#1 |
  -
OH man, I would love to see a constitutional amendment passed in less than three months! |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:19 PM |
#3 |
| -
Apparently, anything can happen |
Bad Thoughts |
May-25-08 05:03 PM |
#31 |
| -
That's what I'm talking about. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:08 PM |
#34 |
| -
her chance of winning on or after August 25th is also 0 |
Gore1FL |
May-25-08 04:18 PM |
#2 |
| -
Maybe "winning" for her means making sure Obama loses... |
polichick |
May-25-08 04:20 PM |
#4 |
| -
I just wonder if voters in the remaining contests would support her if they thought that her only |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:26 PM |
#5 |
| -
As someone who just voted last week, |
LWolf |
May-25-08 05:21 PM |
#41 |
| -
I don't know, who could possibly step in and be the dark horse? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:24 PM |
#42 |
| -
Gore is the obvious, strongest, choice. |
LWolf |
May-25-08 05:54 PM |
#48 |
| -
She has a 50% chance of winning the nomination. |
NJSecularist |
May-25-08 04:27 PM |
#6 |
| -
No she doesn't. |
HawkeyeX |
May-25-08 04:28 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, she does. |
NJSecularist |
May-25-08 04:29 PM |
#9 |
| -
What do you figure are Senator Clinton's odds if you use the definition of winning that I provided? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:31 PM |
#11 |
| -
She cannot win before the convention. |
NJSecularist |
May-25-08 04:32 PM |
#12 |
| -
Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Why do you say she can't win before the convention? Just curious. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:33 PM |
#13 |
| -
Because superdelegates can change their minds on the convention floor. n/t |
NJSecularist |
May-25-08 04:35 PM |
#14 |
| -
So you're saying superdelegates will not change their minds before then? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:36 PM |
#16 |
| -
It's a more organized format for the SDs to change their minds at the convention. |
NJSecularist |
May-25-08 04:38 PM |
#17 |
| -
I see. Thanks! I agree that if the SDs switch en masse, it will most likely be at the Convention. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:41 PM |
#20 |
| -
But she can LOSE before the convention. We all know she can, because she did. |
dicksteele |
May-25-08 04:50 PM |
#23 |
| -
How do you figure? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:28 PM |
#8 |
| -
That poster thinks they're being reasonable, by allowing that anyone BESIDES Queen Inevitable |
impeachdubya |
May-25-08 06:05 PM |
#51 |
| -
yes |
swampg8r |
May-25-08 04:29 PM |
#10 |
| -
haha yes, I guess it is 50%. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:45 PM |
#21 |
| -
She's already LOST the nomination. It's a fact. Get over it already. |
dicksteele |
May-25-08 04:48 PM |
#22 |
| -
only if they decide it by coin toss |
quaker bill |
May-25-08 05:05 PM |
#33 |
| -
You could say there are three possible outcomes. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:10 PM |
#35 |
| -
If this were a truly even race I'd actually be all in favor of that |
Hippo_Tron |
May-25-08 05:50 PM |
#47 |
| -
It is the only way she gets to 50:50 |
quaker bill |
May-25-08 06:03 PM |
#49 |
| -
Hey, look! That leprechaun is fucking that Unicorn! |
impeachdubya |
May-25-08 06:04 PM |
#50 |
| -
No |
Duder |
May-25-08 04:35 PM |
#15 |
| -
There are 40 SDs up for grabs. Obama needs 10. Clinton needs 200. |
baldguy |
May-25-08 04:39 PM |
#18 |
| -
Before or after even if Obama implodes. |
Radical Activist |
May-25-08 04:39 PM |
#19 |
| -
I agree |
Swamp Rat |
May-25-08 04:57 PM |
#29 |
| -
No. |
ButterflyBlood |
May-25-08 04:52 PM |
#24 |
| -
Yo, Beat: |
dicksteele |
May-25-08 04:53 PM |
#25 |
| -
Oh no! |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:55 PM |
#26 |
| -
Thank you-cThat's EXACTLY why I chose that pic to label for this purpose! |
dicksteele |
May-25-08 05:40 PM |
#43 |
| -
Other: |
LWolf |
May-25-08 04:56 PM |
#27 |
| -
Well, what if you use the definition of winning that I included in the poll? Just curious. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:57 PM |
#30 |
| -
I disagree with that definition of "winning." |
LWolf |
May-25-08 05:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
I agree, it's not fair that the field was narrowed so quickly. You just made me think of something! |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:20 PM |
#40 |
| -
Some things that would help: |
LWolf |
May-25-08 05:47 PM |
#46 |
| -
I am glad that the "other" option was not for naught. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 04:57 PM |
#28 |
| -
Greater than zero |
quaker bill |
May-25-08 05:04 PM |
#32 |
| -
0.0001%... you may be right. |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:12 PM |
#37 |
| -
NO |
FrenchieCat |
May-25-08 05:11 PM |
#36 |
| -
If voters knew that Hillary can't win* except at Denver, do you think they'd still vote for her? |
beat tk |
May-25-08 05:16 PM |
#39 |
| -
August 2016 n/t |
intaglio |
May-25-08 05:44 PM |
#44 |
| -
Please add "Fuck no because she is a heartless sack of dog excrement." n/t |
greguganus |
May-25-08 05:46 PM |
#45 |
| -
Stop insulting dog excrement like that! |
baldguy |
May-25-08 06:57 PM |
#52 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread