Reply #17: anigbrowl, thank you,

[SunsetDreams]

I've wondered about this myself. Barack has received wide acclaim from Economists and Professors for his economic policies and speech, and it seems there is this one lone voice out there that says that it's crap. That made me question him highly. It seems he has became so wrapped up in his support for Sen. Clinton, he has lost his ability to be objective. Now with regard to the Glass-Steagall act, that is highly troubling to leave that out indeed. How can a REAL economist leave that out of the analysis? I go back to him being so wrapped up in his support for her, that just like Sen.Clinton he is willing to risk his credibility, and try and ignore the bad that came out of Bill Clintons' presidency, while only shining light on the good. In Sen. Clintons' case, going so far as to take credit or partial credit for that good, but denying the bad. It doesn't work that way!