Reply #19: Let's step into your shoes for a moment ...

[phrigndumass]

How is this logical?

"Obama may win the pledged delegates, but Clinton will win the popular vote. Since Clinton will win the popular vote, she will earn the endorsements of at least three-fourths of the remaining superdelegates."

This seems to be what you're implying, without taking into account the numbers, and it's absolutely ludicrous.

Here's why it's ludicrous (and I'm being "kind" to Senator Clinton's figures):

If Obama wins pledged delegates 52% to 48%, that would be 1,694 pledged delegates, or 331 short of the goal. He already has about 213 superdelegates endorsing him, leaving him 118 of the remaining 333 superdelegates to endorse him for the nomination, or roughly 35%.

If Clinton wins "popular" vote by 52% to 48%. With 1,533 pledged delegates, or 489 short of the goal, she already has about 249 superdelegates endorsing her, leaving her 240 of the remaining 333 superdelegates to endorse her for the nomination, or roughly 72%.

:wow:

Edited to say: Her campaign can't even win a primary by that much, so what makes you think logically that she can win the remaining superdelegates by that percentage?