Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 20. I AM NOT A HILLARY SUPPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
WHY DO YOU F***ING OBAMABOTS ALWAYS ASSUME THAT????????
|
| -It would be easy for Hillary Clinton to back off, but she fights for EVERYTHING |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:28 PM |
#0 |
 -
To the point of sounding irrational and crazy? |
Wolsh |
Feb-26-08 08:30 PM |
#1 |
 -
And who would that be? |
emilyg |
Feb-26-08 08:31 PM |
#2 |
| -
only to 'irrational' listeners. |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:32 PM |
#3 |
 -
or sexist assholes |
Skittles |
Feb-26-08 08:33 PM |
#7 |
| -
Your candidate is losing, so everyone must be sexist... riiight. |
washingdem |
Feb-26-08 08:44 PM |
# |
| -
I AM NOT A HILLARY SUPPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Skittles |
Feb-26-08 08:47 PM |
#20 |
| -
No, washington, that's not it. nt. |
cbayer |
Feb-26-08 09:57 PM |
#50 |
| -
Are you deaf or hard of hearing or short on vocabulary? |
Auntie Bush |
Feb-26-08 09:10 PM |
#33 |
| -
Fighting women are always called that. |
aquart |
Feb-26-08 09:48 PM |
#45 |
| -
Calling Hillary Clinton irrational & crazy is just plain offensive. |
cbayer |
Feb-26-08 09:56 PM |
#49 |
| -
Sorry about the late reply to this |
hendo |
Feb-27-08 02:54 PM |
#80 |
| -
I would rather have a fighter that is a winner |
Generic Brad |
Feb-26-08 08:33 PM |
#4 |
| -
this isn't the general election |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:37 PM |
#42 |
| -
She's belligerent in my opinion |
high density |
Feb-26-08 08:33 PM |
#5 |
| -
Deliciously belligerent |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:34 PM |
#9 |
| -
But there's no sexism in that judgement. Is there? |
aquart |
Feb-26-08 09:49 PM |
#46 |
| -
ABSOLUTELY!!! |
BigDaddy44 |
Feb-26-08 08:33 PM |
#6 |
| -
Unbelievable!! |
Window |
Feb-26-08 08:40 PM |
#11 |
| -
She is absolutely wonderful tonight! |
MyPetRock |
Feb-26-08 08:34 PM |
#8 |
| -
Having been in combat, I can assure you that combat is an awful metaphor for politics |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 08:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
You are the only one that mentioned combat. |
Uzybone |
Feb-26-08 08:42 PM |
#12 |
| -
If I was wrong to equate "fight" and "combat", I apologize |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 08:45 PM |
#17 |
| -
that's a stretch |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:43 PM |
#15 |
| -
Repeating from above: I apologize if I was wrong to equate the terms "fight" and "combat" |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 08:46 PM |
#18 |
| -
Voters can clearly see that she is going to be relentless and insistent |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:53 PM |
#23 |
| -
Except it's not a "fight" |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 08:57 PM |
#25 |
| -
There are degrees of fighting. Everyone understands that. |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:01 PM |
#28 |
| -
No, there's not, really |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 09:06 PM |
#30 |
| -
that's just not been my life experience. My 'fights' haven't led to death, injury, destruction . . . |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:12 PM |
#35 |
| -
Then they were conflicts, not fights |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 09:14 PM |
#36 |
| -
that narrow definition or yours is not reflected in the history of literature |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
I agree |
sniffa |
Feb-26-08 08:43 PM |
#13 |
| -
Obama looks sleepy |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:59 PM |
#26 |
| -
It's probably the heroin binge he was on last night |
sniffa |
Feb-26-08 09:10 PM |
#32 |
| -
maybe he had a big meal beforehand |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:14 PM |
#37 |
| -
Really? I want a president who doesn't need to fight. |
bowens43 |
Feb-26-08 08:43 PM |
#14 |
| -
then you want a president who will do nothing |
Uzybone |
Feb-26-08 08:50 PM |
#22 |
| -
So your vision of government is everybody agrees with Obama |
aquart |
Feb-26-08 09:51 PM |
#47 |
| -
you seem to think things will be slam dunk for him. Wake up. |
rodeodance |
Feb-27-08 08:19 AM |
#70 |
| -
She's awesome tonight. |
busymom |
Feb-26-08 08:44 PM |
#16 |
| -
Soon you'll be one of the few left who are voting for her... |
scheming daemons |
Feb-26-08 08:46 PM |
#19 |
| -
what an idiotic statement |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 07:09 AM |
#64 |
| -
So Combative |
NeedleCast |
Feb-26-08 08:48 PM |
#21 |
| -
I know. She has me fired up. |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 08:55 PM |
#24 |
| -
I guess... |
NeedleCast |
Feb-26-08 09:08 PM |
#31 |
| -
beats sulking or coming to this debate and these contests with the resignation the pundits imagine |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:18 PM |
#39 |
| -
There goes her huge donations from the debate sponsors. n/t |
greguganus |
Feb-26-08 09:43 PM |
#43 |
| -
from debate sponsors? |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:45 PM |
#44 |
| -
Yeah, women should be more submissive. |
aquart |
Feb-26-08 09:52 PM |
#48 |
| -
Yup, she's a fighter! |
Auntie Bush |
Feb-26-08 09:00 PM |
#27 |
| -
I hope she NEVER concedes one damn thing. |
Rageneau |
Feb-26-08 09:03 PM |
#29 |
| -
I support, without reservation, her right to do so if she thinks that's the best course of action |
dmesg |
Feb-26-08 09:10 PM |
#34 |
| -
She will know when and if the time is right--it not now. Wise of her. |
rodeodance |
Feb-27-08 08:27 AM |
#72 |
| -
Bullshit- it means she can't see the forest for the trees |
thevoiceofreason |
Feb-26-08 09:20 PM |
#40 |
| -
Bullshit, back at ya {insert appropriate metaphor here} |
bigtree |
Feb-26-08 09:25 PM |
#41 |
| -
Mine too |
thevoiceofreason |
Feb-26-08 10:32 PM |
#58 |
| -
Like Bill fought against DOMA and welfare reform? |
heraldsqure |
Feb-26-08 09:57 PM |
#51 |
| -
right, because women don't deserve to be judged on their own merits, |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 07:11 AM |
#65 |
| -
Only if.. |
hendo |
Feb-27-08 08:15 AM |
#67 |
| -
only idiots believe that she should be judged on everything her husband has said and done |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 10:22 AM |
#74 |
| -
So. |
hendo |
Feb-27-08 02:51 PM |
#79 |
| -
Wrong. |
anonymous171 |
Feb-26-08 09:58 PM |
#52 |
| -
That's a problem. And she isn't much of a fighter, anyway...she's ducked a lot of them in this |
milkyway |
Feb-26-08 10:03 PM |
#53 |
| -
everything except stopping immoral and illegal wars of aggression |
LucyParsons |
Feb-26-08 10:19 PM |
#54 |
| -
I just hope she won't fight against her inevitable defeat... |
RiverStone |
Feb-26-08 10:23 PM |
#55 |
| -
too bad she doesn't win |
stillcool47 |
Feb-26-08 10:27 PM |
#56 |
| -
Tim Russert is flagrantly biased...He goes into a 5 minute diatribe beating Hillary over the head |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Feb-26-08 10:30 PM |
#57 |
| -
the first two were tabloid, right off the bat |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 07:14 AM |
#66 |
| -
Unfortunately, she's just not a really *good* fighter |
AchtungToddler |
Feb-26-08 10:37 PM |
#59 |
| -
It's like the "vetted" nonsense |
dmesg |
Feb-27-08 12:22 AM |
#61 |
| -
I think she is. Over 10 million voters apparently think so as well. |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 07:01 AM |
#62 |
| -
"she fights for EVERYTHING" |
krkaufman |
Feb-26-08 10:52 PM |
#60 |
| -
And that's why she's the better candidate |
OzarkDem |
Feb-27-08 07:01 AM |
#63 |
| -
I liked her comment about even though her health plan failed-she went right back to work |
rodeodance |
Feb-27-08 08:18 AM |
#68 |
| -
So you're voting for Huckabee? I'm confused. n/t |
casus belli |
Feb-27-08 08:19 AM |
#69 |
| -
yes, you are confused. |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 10:26 AM |
#76 |
| -
Even if she destroys the democratic party and gets John McCain elected?? |
workinclasszero |
Feb-27-08 08:22 AM |
#71 |
| -
Oh stop with the fear tactics. We have had enough with Bush/rove/ cheney!! |
rodeodance |
Feb-27-08 08:29 AM |
#73 |
| -
Concern over Hillary 'destroying the party' is just some political tactic |
bigtree |
Feb-27-08 10:25 AM |
#75 |
| -
She would "Fight" for the last piece of pie |
From The Left |
Feb-27-08 10:26 AM |
#77 |
| -
yes! |
DemEtienne |
Feb-27-08 10:38 AM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread