You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: I believe so [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. I believe so
And quite frankly, it is her best strategy at this point. Super Tuesday was effectively a draw, with Obama coming out slightly ahead in pledged delegates. Had Clinton done better, I think she would be much more competitive right now. But as it sits right now, she had little chance of winning any other February states save Maine and Wisconsin. Maine was a caucus, and was not exactly a Clinton stronghold, which is why Obama ended up winning handily. It looks like Wisconsin will probably fall for Obama as well. At this point, it would be worse to fight all out in Wisconsin and lose than it would be to save those resources for March 4. There are 14 contests after February and many of those already seem like locks for Obama. MS and NC in the South, MT, ND, and WY out west, as well as OR look likely to go to Obama. IN, KY, and WV are pretty much toss-ups, and will likely be decided by who has the momentum going into those contests. Which leaves us with Clinton's 5 best chances at a winning. Luckily for her, 4 of those contests are on the same day, March 4. RI and VT might be more likely for Obama if they were not in the shadow of OH and TX. If Obama spends time in those two states he could very well win, but in so doing lose the bigger prizes of the day. A more balanced approach by Obama could lead to losing all 4 states. Of course, this is all premature as the race could shift between now and March 4, but I believe Clinton's hopes lie in sweeping March 4. From there PA would be a strong chance for her to solidify a come back. Even still it may not be enough to overcome Obama's pledged delegate lead, but it should bring the gap small enough that Superdelegates could feel free voting for her without worrying about "going against" the will of the voters. Obama's strategy now is to run up the score for the rest of the month, take RI and VT on March 4, and hope that momentum helps him blunt in leads Clinton might have in OH and TX. If March 4 comes out looking like a wash, or even better a win for Obama, the race is all but over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC