You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: Also consider the following angle's effect on late voting in FLorida... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
55. Also consider the following angle's effect on late voting in FLorida...
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 02:44 AM by krkaufman
expanded from my earlier post... http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4280405&mesg_id=4280405

Why did Senator Clinton feel the need to make the request to seat Florida's delegates just a few days BEFORE the Florida primary?

Couldn't this move be seen as an effort to skirt the "no campaigning" agreement, knowing that the request to seat the delegates would be given widespread coverage on local news in Florida, painting Hillary Clinton in a favorable light and as a "friend of the Florida voter"? Consider the following sampling of Florida news stories, published just 3-4 days before the Florida primary...
Might the news coverage of the request have had an effect on the vote margin, and especially very late and election day voting? And couldn't the delegates request have been made AFTER the Florida primary, perhaps during her "victory" speech, when it wouldn't have had ANY effect on the vote? Was a similar request made immediately before or after the Michigan primary? If not, again, why the timing of the Florida request, just a couple days before the "no campaigning" primary?

The most likely reason for the timing of the request is that Hillary was scraping for every vote she could get, in an uncontested primary where she already held a significant name recognition advantage, to provide cover for her massive defeat in the previous, actually contested, primary in South Carolina, in order to slow Obama's momentum heading into Super Tuesday.

Further, reviewing the Florida exit poll data...
...did the Clinton campaign decide to make this public request after seeing the late momentum from Obama, in the weeks leading up to the primary? And might not the publicity from delegates request be a significant factor in Hillary Clinton's momentum turnaround in election day voting?

If the "no campaigning" pledge was not broken, it sure looks like it was bent all to hell. Chalk another one up in the "do anything" column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC