You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #14: That's what I was thinking. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. That's what I was thinking.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 06:17 PM by HughMoran

Edit - I think I spoke reflexively so I'm pulling my words, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -BC just said that Jesse Jackson won the SC primary in '84 & '88 HughMoran  Jan-26-08 05:43 PM   #0 
  - BC is Bill Clinton?  Katzenkavalier   Jan-26-08 05:44 PM   #1 
  - Yes, Bill Clinton  HughMoran   Jan-26-08 05:49 PM   #17 
  - And if so, your point? Did he also win Iowa?  Kristi1696   Jan-26-08 05:45 PM   #2 
  - He won the whitest state, Vermont, and Alaska too  jackson_dem   Jan-26-08 05:46 PM   #9 
  - Yes.  lurky   Jan-26-08 05:45 PM   #3 
  - Slick's implication is that S.C. only counts if herself wins.  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 05:54 PM   #28 
  - I think it was a caucus, not a primary.  Zynx   Jan-26-08 05:45 PM   #4 
  - It was the way the delegates were chosen in S.C., so it was just as real as a primary woulda been.  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 05:51 PM   #20 
  - everytime he speaks he is more patronizing and irrelevent  grantcart   Jan-26-08 05:45 PM   # 
  - Yes, that's what wikipedia says.  Eric J in MN   Jan-26-08 05:45 PM   #5 
  - yes he did, which shows how relevant to the process SC is  Tarc   Jan-26-08 05:46 PM   #6 
  - So Iowa and SC are not relevant... but NH and Nevada are?  Katzenkavalier   Jan-26-08 05:47 PM   #10 
  - No, but the upcoming super tuesday primarys are more important  Tarc   Jan-26-08 06:15 PM   #53 
  - That's what I was thinking.  HughMoran   Jan-26-08 05:48 PM   #14 
  - Wrong.  H2O Man   Jan-26-08 05:51 PM   #21 
  - Perhaps a poor choice of words  HughMoran   Jan-26-08 06:10 PM   #47 
  - Jesse was NOT a non-factor  no name no slogan   Jan-26-08 05:52 PM   #22 
     - And the result in '88 proves it was WRONG to insist on Jesse and the Rainbow being frozen out.  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 05:59 PM   #35 
        - I was pushing for Jesse to be VP on the ticket!  no name no slogan   Jan-26-08 06:11 PM   #48 
           - Sorry, didn't mean to slam you personally  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 06:13 PM   #50 
              - Kucinich supporter, eh? Me too ('04 and '08)  no name no slogan   Jan-26-08 06:19 PM   #56 
                 - Indeed. These days, it depresses me in MOST ways...  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 06:36 PM   #57 
  - clown  H2O Man   Jan-26-08 05:49 PM   #16 
     - How insightful and profound  Tarc   Jan-26-08 06:14 PM   #51 
  - True. Happened before.  robbedvoter   Jan-26-08 05:46 PM   #7 
  - Yes  bluestateguy   Jan-26-08 05:46 PM   #8 
  - sadly that is what I experienced yesterday.......  unapatriciated   Jan-26-08 06:04 PM   #42 
  - I'm pretty sure SC was a caucus in both those elections.  ellisonz   Jan-26-08 05:47 PM   #11 
  - I think it's true for '88, not sure about '84.  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 05:47 PM   #12 
  - Jesse Jackson Won Thirteen Primaries And Caucuses In 1988  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-26-08 05:48 PM   #13 
  - ...and in reward for all is victories, in reward for the hundreds of thousands  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 05:53 PM   #26 
     - The Coalition fell on its own sword in some ways  no name no slogan   Jan-26-08 05:58 PM   #34 
        - I realize Jesse himself was partly to blame.  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 06:02 PM   #40 
           - I agree wholeheartedly. Despite a Dem pres, the 90s were BAD for us  no name no slogan   Jan-26-08 06:07 PM   #43 
  - Oh puke. Well, Jackson also won my state of Vermont  cali   Jan-26-08 05:48 PM   #15 
  - Wait, did Bill Clinton actually say this? Is he actually trying to liken Obama to Jackson?  Kristi1696   Jan-26-08 05:50 PM   #18 
  - oh nos  angie_love   Jan-26-08 05:53 PM   #23 
  - It is a compliment in my book.  robbedvoter   Jan-26-08 06:00 PM   #36 
  - But Clinton was only referring to the color of their skin.  Kristi1696   Jan-26-08 06:16 PM   #55 
  - Uh, why?  aquart   Jan-26-08 06:08 PM   #45 
  - Cheap Shot Artist Bill. Yup. That sounds like its right up his alley.  dkf   Jan-26-08 05:50 PM   #19 
  - 100% true  rufus dog   Jan-26-08 05:53 PM   #24 
  - That's it Bill; keep trying to tell us Obama is insignificant.  sparosnare   Jan-26-08 05:53 PM   #25 
  - Shameful.  Unsane   Jan-26-08 05:54 PM   #27 
  - Shameshameshameshame. Boy, some people just love that word.  Notorious Bohemian   Jan-26-08 05:56 PM   #30 
  - Of course, everyone here is slamming Bill Clinton over this, BUT  joeybee12   Jan-26-08 05:55 PM   #29 
  - Perspective:  H2O Man   Jan-26-08 05:58 PM   #33 
  - Nice snide answer...  joeybee12   Jan-26-08 06:01 PM   #38 
     - Right.  H2O Man   Jan-26-08 06:02 PM   #41 
  - The Question put to bill was, why is it taking two clintons to beat him?  rufus dog   Jan-26-08 06:02 PM   #39 
     - Ultimately, "it may TAKE A VILLAGE OF CLINTONS"  Ken Burch   Jan-26-08 06:47 PM   #58 
  - Is Bill Clinton trying to point out Obama is black, again?  knowledgeispwr   Jan-26-08 05:56 PM   #31 
  - Is he? gee, if it weren't for Bill, I wouldn't have noticed at all!  robbedvoter   Jan-26-08 06:01 PM   #37 
  - That's exactly what he was saying. I venture to say if he hadn't  babylonsister   Jan-26-08 06:14 PM   #52 
  - Bill answers a non-racial question with a racial answer. I cannot stand this guy. nm  TeamJordan23   Jan-26-08 05:57 PM   #32 
  - I'm officially over Bill.  lurky   Jan-26-08 06:08 PM   #44 
  - Bill Clinton lied again! South Carolina did not have primaries back then  IndianaGreen   Jan-26-08 06:10 PM   #46 
  - He may have said "won South Carolina"  HughMoran   Jan-26-08 06:12 PM   #49 
  - And Edwards won it four years ago.  jefferson_dem   Jan-26-08 06:15 PM   #54 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC