Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. Go and watch the video, and see for yourself |
|
The audience isn't only laughing, it's applauding aswell. Go to this video, and go to where there is 5:55 time left: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... |
| -Tuesday's debate and the real danger of a Hillary Clinton nomination |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:51 PM |
#0 |
 -
The American public thought John Kerry won all three debates with Bush, |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 04:55 PM |
#1 |
 -
Um...except that Kerry actually won the election |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:56 PM |
#2 |
| -
And Kerry cut Bush's lead by around 10 points |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-01-07 04:59 PM |
#5 |
 -
Good point. Bush really tanked after that first debate |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:01 PM |
#7 |
| -
I don't follow you...are you implying that a poor performance in the debates is a good thing? |
earthlover |
Nov-01-07 08:59 PM |
#65 |
| -
No, but I don't think Hillary Clinton was all that bad the other night, |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 10:38 PM |
#68 |
| -
It was HOW she did poorly that was potentially devestating |
earthlover |
Nov-02-07 06:17 AM |
#69 |
| -
Here's my hope--that IF she wins, she will come out of her permanent |
wienerdoggie |
Nov-01-07 04:57 PM |
#3 |
| -
That's everybody's hope. But then there's always the run for a second term... |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:58 PM |
#4 |
| -
That's not going to happen- she is what she is. |
Katzenkavalier |
Nov-01-07 09:03 PM |
#66 |
| -
bwahahah |
cali |
Nov-01-07 05:00 PM |
#6 |
| -
Losing arguments seems to be turning you nasty. |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:03 PM |
#9 |
| -
Jgraz, don't look now but.. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:17 PM |
#17 |
| -
Thanks Lirwin. I know how much your opinion is valued on this board. |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
I personally don't see anything wrong with her answers. |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:02 PM |
#8 |
| -
I agree these answers aren't so bad. |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 05:06 PM |
#11 |
| -
When the audience laughs derisively at you, it's a bad answer |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:08 PM |
#13 |
| -
Erm.. did you actually WATCH the debate? Or have you only read the transcript? |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
Uh..ok. Just keep saying that and it may begin to sound believable |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:12 PM |
#15 |
| -
Alrighty |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:16 PM |
#16 |
| -
Let's see. Who else thinks the audience was laughing at Russert? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
yeah, I just posted as much just below |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
Here's a link to the exchange.. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:23 PM |
#22 |
| -
ha...one clap is not "applause" |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:27 PM |
#24 |
| -
One clap? |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:29 PM |
#26 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 05:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
That's wierd. Non-Hillary people are supporting what I am saying |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:34 PM |
#33 |
| -
You realize people can actually just look at the posts, don't you |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:36 PM |
#35 |
| -
Oh ok |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:38 PM |
#36 |
| -
And the rest of us don't care. Why don't you post another thread on her immigration answer? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:42 PM |
#37 |
| -
Aww poor Jgraz. Now he "doesn't care" and changes the subject. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:43 PM |
#38 |
| -
My evaluation hasn't changed. What I don't care about is your blowing up of a side issue |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:48 PM |
#40 |
| -
No, you were the one who brought it up |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
Hokay, Lirwin. Get back to me when your little thread gets more than two people agreeing with you |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:54 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sure thing! |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:56 PM |
#44 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 06:14 PM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 06:18 PM |
#49 |
| -
I think the audience was laughing with her, not at her. |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
Then why did the laughter start in response to her answer and not to Russert's question? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
Go and watch the video, and see for yourself |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:28 PM |
#25 |
| -
The audience starts laughing as she answer's the question for the third time |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
Exactly |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:33 PM |
#31 |
| -
You're the one slow on the uptake. nt |
2rth2pwr |
Nov-01-07 06:02 PM |
#45 |
| -
Oooh...the Rubber/Glue response. Whatever will I do? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 06:16 PM |
#48 |
| -
Your not bad at the comebacks |
2rth2pwr |
Nov-01-07 07:03 PM |
#54 |
| -
They laughed with her. Get it? |
emilyg |
Nov-01-07 06:54 PM |
#53 |
| -
The real danger is that Hillary will do a great job & make a lot |
The_Casual_Observer |
Nov-01-07 05:05 PM |
#10 |
| -
There isn't one Hillary detractor on this board who wouldn't want her to succeed as president |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:07 PM |
#12 |
| -
Totally Irrelevant Supposition |
The River |
Nov-01-07 05:31 PM |
#29 |
| -
This would not be a good showing in a GE debate... |
bunnies |
Nov-01-07 05:30 PM |
#28 |
| -
That may be so... to a degree. |
MGKrebs |
Nov-01-07 06:25 PM |
#51 |
| -
I think adversaries want lots and lots of details to use as ammunition. |
Sparkly |
Nov-01-07 05:32 PM |
#30 |
| -
danger! |
Enrique |
Nov-01-07 05:35 PM |
#34 |
| -
Pennsylvania: Clinton Opens Double Digit Leads |
cali |
Nov-01-07 05:47 PM |
#39 |
| -
Did you mean to post this as an independent thread? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:51 PM |
#42 |
| -
No I didn't, and yes I think it's germane to your OP |
cali |
Nov-01-07 06:07 PM |
#46 |
| -
Once again, reading comprehension bites you in the ass |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 06:23 PM |
#50 |
| -
I don't think you get it, and clearly the fact that practically no one |
cali |
Nov-01-07 06:49 PM |
#52 |
| -
Starting a post with a clearly false assertion doesn't gain you any points |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 07:06 PM |
#55 |
| -
one false statement after another is what YOU are doing. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 07:21 PM |
#56 |
| -
NOW you're playing the vicitm card? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:01 PM |
#59 |
| -
Well, I said I wasn't going to respond, and here I am. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:18 PM |
#60 |
| -
Here's where we started |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:23 PM |
#61 |
| -
OK, I snarked in that thread. But that's hardly where we started. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:31 PM |
#62 |
| -
Note the change in tone following that comment |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:43 PM |
#63 |
| -
LOL! That's probably true, and thank the gods for |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:47 PM |
#64 |
| -
Jgraz, give it a rest. You look more and more foolish after each post. nm. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 07:55 PM |
#57 |
| -
Thanks Lirwin. I really spend a lot of time worrying about what you think |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 07:59 PM |
#58 |
| -
It will be awhile before any damage done is going to show up. then we will know. |
illinoisprogressive |
Nov-01-07 09:08 PM |
#67 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread