Reply #3: That's precisely why we'd back Gore.

[Tesha]

> That means that millions of Americans, even many who
> might not necessarily adore the former vice president,
> hold a rough recollection that in 2000, Al Gore had
> something taken away from him that he rightfully earned.
> And deserved. And won.

That's precisely why The Tesh family would back Gore.

Dennis Kucinich is better on policies, but Gore is
certainly okay; we backed him from the start in 2000.

But the real deal-maker for us is the politics: I
believe it would be a wonderfully rejuvenating thing
for American *AND* the rest of the world to see seated
as the American President the candidate who *CLEARLY*
had his election stolen in 2000 by the neocon traitors.

I think it would give us a lot of opportunity to put
the past eight years behind us and justify a return
to the status quo of 2000, when America still stood as
a world leader in human rights, the desire for peace,
and a stable global economy.

So if Gore jumps in, the Tesh family will jump in
right behind him and work our hearts out for him.

Tesha