Reply #59: Look back at post #17

[ripple]

Are you seriously calling arguments like that nuanced?

You might be a stickler for words, but I suspect they are often the wrong ones. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that you had no idea what the word 'nuance' means when you replied to my post.

At this point, it's clear that you are either trying to somehow justify your error, or you're being deliberately obtuse.

:banghead:

In case you are truly clueless about this, a nuanced approach to politics speaks to the intelligence of the electorate, while a non-nuanced approach generally exploits the peoples' ignorance. Obama falls into the former category, rather than the latter.