Reply #55: "argued and argued about that"

[sandnsea]

Exactly. So don't say the rebuttals weren't out there because they were since you admit you argued and argued about them. What needed to happen is for the arguing to stop and for people to pick up the information available and use it. Just like we did with Hackett and Murtha. If they hadn't had the support of the grassroots, the attacks on them wouldn't have been stopped cold either. You never saw a Republican freaking out over Bush being ridiculed over his cod piece moment did you?? No, because they just keep on attacking. If we don't learn that, we're going to have the same smear campaigns for years to come. Bush didn't do the attacking, his surrogates did. So don't pretend the candidate has to be directly involved either. I don't know what it is about Democrats that some large group always prefers to shoot our candidate instead of the opponent, but that's the biggest problem.

And no matter what bogus bullshit you candidate shooters start with, you always drag in some other pointless line of right wing crap that you should have been fighting in 2004 too.