You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Nuclear Brinkmanship [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Nuclear Brinkmanship
As far as I know the only game of nuclear brinkmanship ever actually played out was Kennedy vs Khrushchev in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

I've studied that for a long time primarily because I lived in Florida when it happened and realized at the ripe, old age of 15, there was no high ground and no winners in any nuclear exchange. If you want a good idea of what I thought would happen, go check out a copy of the book Alas, Babylon!.

What saved us in 1962 wasn't just Kennedy's resolve and determination, but it was Kennedy's ability to recognize when to compromise, when to let your opponent off the hook and how to make concessions. Kennedy was magnitudes more intelligent than Dubya and while Dubya prides himself on his ability to "stick to" a decision, he fails to understand how that inflexibility negates any gains once the opponent starts to compromise.

A basic book on negotiating lays out the premise that you should always remind yourself that your goal is to reach a settlement. It is not, to kill your opponent.
God help us if he ever decided to play "brinkmanship" with a viable enemy. George wouldn't know when to quit. He wouldn't know when he had won, unless the whole frocking world was going up in smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Politcal promise for Bush in Nuclear Peril? MissWaverly  Mar-19-06 02:51 PM   #0 
  - LINKY???  otohara   Mar-19-06 02:56 PM   #1 
  - Edited to show the link  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:05 PM   #3 
  - a "serious showdown" and the possibility of a nuclear exchange is  niyad   Mar-19-06 02:56 PM   #2 
  - This is the clearest evidence yet that he needs staff change  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:08 PM   #4 
  - Nuclear Brinkmanship  ewagner   Mar-19-06 03:17 PM   #7 
  - the Cuban missile crisis was a response to a threat  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:37 PM   #10 
  - between "alas, babylon" and "triumph" I had nightmares for years,  niyad   Mar-19-06 05:21 PM   #18 
     - see the snip I posted below on an Aussie article  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 06:37 PM   #19 
  - It Would be Enough of a Reichstag Fire to Declare Martial Law  AndyTiedye   Mar-19-06 03:53 PM   #13 
     - this would be the downfall of Bush  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 04:00 PM   #14 
        - It Would Be The Downfall of Us All  AndyTiedye   Mar-19-06 08:16 PM   #20 
           - No, I think that it would primarily effect the Northeast & CA  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 08:24 PM   #21 
              - If They Nuke California, The Fallout Will Land All Over the Country  AndyTiedye   Mar-19-06 11:00 PM   #22 
                 - actually I was thinking of the entire Northeast and California  MissWaverly   Mar-20-06 03:38 PM   #23 
  - He Wants to be Relevent? What Could Make Him More Relevent Than…  AndyTiedye   Mar-19-06 03:12 PM   #5 
  - I agree with Russ Feingold  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:15 PM   #6 
     - Good Point Miss Waverly  ewagner   Mar-19-06 03:21 PM   #8 
        - I'll have the lame duck, please  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:41 PM   #11 
  - What a great idea. Blow up the planet with nukes to get better poll #s  cassiepriam   Mar-19-06 03:29 PM   #9 
  - No, the White House is out of touch  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 03:51 PM   #12 
     - Remember what O'Neil  ewagner   Mar-19-06 04:20 PM   #15 
        - Not to mention a good many US citizens  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 04:31 PM   #16 
  - Aussies say Bush wants Nuclear War to keep Puke Congress  MissWaverly   Mar-19-06 05:04 PM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC