First, one has to agree with the creator of the "system" that the issues are indeed "controversial" and that voting one way or another is "a betrayal of the party." In some eyes, voting the opposite of what the system's creator would like might constitute a betrayal... Also, we have to agree with the creators of these systems what "total Democratic unity" means... I'm not knocking the OP or anyone who creates a system to personally measure how Democrats are performing.
But this and the Patrick Henry Mousketeer lunacy you mentioned does seemed designed to have a pre-conceived outcome.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
