You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #135: Beautiful [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #119
135. Beautiful
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 10:03 PM by omega minimo
Better answer quick ;) :hi:

Beautiful as always, HS. Thank you for going down into the hidden stillness. That is ZACKLY what this (at least this OP) is about.

"Making an image of the eternal, or trying to describe it, "kills" it, as it reduces the All Beyond that can't be named, to your fixed place. That which existed before every thought, before our existence, is actually not connected to a line that extended to our finite thinking and naming. It can only be grasped by another kind of mind, a contemplation that freed itself of its own inventions."

Then:
"These are all tricky topics--if the angry reaction to these cartoons is justified because it is "their religion," then what about a riot because someone suggested that a woman might be a prophet or salvation of the world, or suggested that God created gays and loves them?"

I wouldn't say it is justified. It seemed that the outrage would be impacted by the taboo on visual imagery; it was obvious at DU that many Americans were ignorant of it and the "get over it" crowd might learn something (or not :rofl: ) I certainly learned something here.

Brilliant:

"I think there were two issues: the need to keep the Absolute Beyond un-interpreted, and understood as being unlike what we can think (although we can reach it, just not describe it as it was in itself), and the understanding that you cannot stop criticizing the injustices of Islam (as everything else) just because there is retribution. What is the only possible result, when the enlightened, tolerant side allows expression of attacks against it, and the oppressor allows no expression but submission, and then attacks the other? Eventually, it makes inroads that become threatening and that eventually, whatever anyone wants, will have to be confronted with criticism anyway."

And the really tricky part is when it goes both ways.

edit:
BTW all this conflagration and the insistent destructive hatred of MEN MEN MEN MEN MEN MEN (where are the women?) is PROOF as well as a CALL for "a woman might be a prophet or salvation of the world." Plural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC