Reply #41: That seems to point out

[PATRICK]

exactly what I was saying in support of TIA, as little as I understand of the number crunching. The most powerful "weighting" in TIA's favor is the consistency, the necessity, the predictability and the MAMMOTH research into methodologies of fraud employed. It must be frustrating trying to maintain some belief that Bush won when all the proof must be destroyed or changed or mystified in the process- such as granting that the NEP was "erroneous" and either must be corrected or dismissed.

Tell that to Putin and the Ukraine. They WISH they had that kind of control over the election. In essence, once resorting to trashing all the NEP in order to remove TIA from the board, one is left with the feeble fabrications of "morals" analysts who ALSO have cooked things from PARTS of the cooked NEP to have it their way. No one even talks about that embarrassment anymore. I wonder why? Instead a more shadowy presumption moves underneath the Kerry kicking, shoot-our-loser talk. Rove, that guy Rove, who told us how he did this clever thing here, that clever thing there. Wow, I guess we just have to do things better, maybe like not putting so many big words in the platform and toning down the populism. Oh yeah, Bush was such a great war president and blah blah blah the terrified sheeple always veer toward the lucky faux warlord. Anyone buying that one now? I for one would like to at least keep the process of elimination going over our shadow president's second "victory" over the American voter. Or maybe there are millions of secret Amish voters hidden in farm compounds scattered around the key state precincts.

And never forget, even though the votes cannot be retrieved, the fraud, the perps, the witnesses, and evidence of fraud CAN. In fact, there is an inexorable march toward nearly all these things and people who would nervously dismiss the very idea of prosecuting this buried issue. None of Bush's advantages that one single debate performance in a fair media would have sunk like a stone, do more than explain why Kerry didn't sweep the board, millions of votes suppressed or not.