Reply #9: Curioser and curiouser ...

[RoyGBiv]

Broadly considering the circumstances of the Plame outing -- the whole thing involving Bush's justification for war -- and some things that have happened since, I wonder if Chalabi's name shows up in this at some point.

OnEdit: I remember an article from around November (can't remember if it was before or after the election, but I think before) that noted we'd all just to have patience on the Plame story. Naturally a lot of people wanted it out right then and there, but the caution explained that this was a very deep case involving so many tangents and individuals that to break it on any one element would endanger the entirety of it. Fitgerald at that time was described as an attack dog that wouldn't let go once he hit flesh, but he wouldn't break his cover until he knew he could get a good hold.

I've always kept that in mind, half-thinking it was just wishful thinking, but the more I witness recent events, the more this article seems true. I wish I could find it again, or even remember who wrote it.