You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: Think nothin' of it, Pookie [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Think nothin' of it, Pookie
I can understand your frustration with men my age but it does little good to anyone to jump to a conclusion about someone. Internet discussions can be difficult because the only form of expression is written word (which I think is the main reason for flame wars...there are no disarming chuckles or facial expressions on a message board).

And I'm working on building my travel/language portfolio. Speak Portuguese and a little French and have been to Brazil and am off to Quebec tomorrow.

I guess I need to update or elaborate my profile. I went to undergrad at UGA in Athens which is a quite liberal place. I'm back in GA for the summer but do attend grad school in Mississippi. So I don't really know any older women in Mississippi like that but I know quite a few in Georgia.

And thank you for the recommendation. I got my degree in Philosophy and have always held as one of my basic principles: I know that I do not know, a la Socrates. I will check out this Maimonides individual.

I don't do much parroting of a default program. I was definitely not raised in a traditional household and my parents were proactive in letting their kids' opinions develop as independently as is possible.

My view is consistent with that expressed in Roe: it is the choice of the mother and/or father up to a certain point at which the government has an interest to protect a citizen.

Perhaps things do work better if the female has absolute control over reproduction but that seems to run parallel to the line of thinking I often hear that a family works better with the man in charge or marriage works better with one man and one woman. It just doesn't seem that the rights of an individual, say the father, can be disregarded because the system works better to exclude them.

So now that we know each other a bit better maybe we can continue the discussion...I find that if you whittle away at a disagreement long enough there is either no fundamental disagreement, just a failure to communicate, or there is an important fundamental disagreement, one which probably can't be resolved.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC