Reply #13: I don't give a fuck about what is politically advantageous

[LittleClarkie]

to Kerry either. YOU are the one who put that frame on his actions, not me. I was pointing out that what he has done so far was not done for his advantage as you claim. He was doing the right thing. That's what it looks like when a wonk does his thing. It ain't flash but there you have it.

And what I said had nothing to do with the damn children's bill. That was just an example for you to see what happens when he's trying to publicize something. Bupkus, that's what happens.

By the way, I admit nothing. You misunderstand me. I refute that you think Kerry is doing what he's doing because it's politically advantageous. Politically advantageous would have been to not mention a fucking thing about DSM. Why do you think Clinton is pretending he doesn't even know what it is. If you want to see someone who makes those kinds of calcuations, look at Bill. And what is he doing? Ignoring DSM. So what do you think the politically advantageous move probably is. That's right. Not to even have mentioned it. Kerry did something. Why the fuck are you on his back for it. God forbid. He would have been better off doing nothing. Fuck it. What does it matter. He does something and he's shit, he does nothing and he's shit. I'm not sure why he even bothers. Whatever he does will and almost always is misunderstood.

He asked a committee to do it's fucking job. I thought that was something, even if you didn't. It was a damn good point. And now we know who to bug the shit out of. Sen. Roberts that's who.

Now, I was talking about my Senator and how he was too chickenshit to sign Kerry's letter, and in fact wouldn't answer me as to why. THAT is what I was posting about. Not about whether or not Kerry did what he did for political reasons.

He did something. And I'm trying to support that something. Either get on the fucking bus and contact your Senator or get of our backs.