You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Any response to my point below? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Any response to my point below?
You obviously feel Saddam with nukes was a threat that justified our actions,yet I've shown some other countries that are equally,if not more so (China especially), a threat to world safety.

Do you also believe we should tackle these countries? If so why,if not why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Can someone explain this Kerry quote to me... mzmolly  Jan-25-04 11:14 PM   #0 
  - Ok, I won't vote for him  lcordero   Jan-25-04 11:15 PM   #1 
  - lol...too bad the press caters to the Kerry campaign ...they want an easy  cthrumatrix   Jan-26-04 04:47 AM   #56 
  - What does he mean?  Kal Belgarion   Jan-25-04 11:19 PM   #2 
  - asphincter says what? Huh? Exactly!  jmusgrat   Jan-25-04 11:21 PM   #3 
  - Wouldn't this be considered a gaffe?  dansolo   Jan-25-04 11:22 PM   #4 
  - Either way....  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:24 PM   #5 
  - One word that John Kerry needed to have looked up in Merriam-Webster...  krkaufman   Jan-26-04 02:25 AM   #38 
     - Perhaps Kerry confused imminent with Eminem  IndianaGreen   Jan-26-04 02:31 AM   #43 
  - In the media's eyes, it's "statesman-like"  cprise   Jan-25-04 11:26 PM   #6 
     - For now. The RNC did a paper on John Kerry entitled "will he say anything  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:28 PM   #7 
  - It's pretty simple if you are willing to understand it.  Feanorcurufinwe   Jan-25-04 11:30 PM   #8 
  - Not at all what he said, nice try though...  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:55 PM   #17 
  - Given your massive elipsis here you need to provide a link  cindyw   Jan-25-04 11:32 PM   #9 
  - Dean was lied to also, so was Kucinich. Kerry calls himself a leader  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:42 PM   #11 
  - "Saddam must be disarmed"  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 01:53 AM   #24 
     - You both have a done a fantastic job  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 01:57 AM   #27 
        - 4 more years! 4 more years!  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:15 AM   #35 
           - Fear and guilt wont work on me  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:24 AM   #37 
              - Amazing how they use fear in the same way as Bush  IndianaGreen   Jan-26-04 02:27 AM   #41 
              - I'm immune to it  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:39 AM   #46 
              - Soul intact?  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:29 AM   #42 
                 - Dems will lead us away from the edge  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:38 AM   #45 
                    - Better than going over n/t  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:40 AM   #47 
                       - We will anyways  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:50 AM   #50 
  - That really is the point, cindyw, thanks for distilling it down  Old and In the Way   Jan-26-04 12:20 AM   #22 
     - Considering he didn't have nuclear weapons it was a moot point n/t.  mzmolly   Jan-26-04 12:25 AM   #23 
  - From the way the quote is broken up...  Nicholas_J   Jan-25-04 11:39 PM   #10 
  - Sounds like double talk to me. The statement is crystal clear.  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:47 PM   #13 
  - He also said something like that on CBS 60 minutes  question everything   Jan-25-04 11:45 PM   #12 
  - By February it was obvious that Bush was going to war  IndianaGreen   Jan-25-04 11:48 PM   #14 
  - Riiiight, that's why he failed to support Kennedys resolution.  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:53 PM   #15 
  - Is Saddam a threat with nuclear weapons? n/t  sandnsea   Jan-25-04 11:55 PM   #16 
  - Nope, he never had any.... n/t  mzmolly   Jan-25-04 11:57 PM   #18 
  - He tried. But Israel bombed his reactor back in 1982  question everything   Jan-26-04 12:06 AM   #20 
  - *stories* ... *1982* ... sorry not related n/t  mzmolly   Jan-26-04 12:17 AM   #21 
  - You knew that in 2002??  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 01:54 AM   #25 
     - Any response to my point below?  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:00 AM   #29 
        - Oh why hell yes  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:14 AM   #33 
  - Is the US? How about China? Pakistan maybe?  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 12:00 AM   #19 
     - Just explaining the quote  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 01:56 AM   #26 
        - So using chemical weapons is the point of no return  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:08 AM   #30 
           - This is insane  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:13 AM   #32 
              - Just asking you for some consistancy  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:19 AM   #36 
                 - Dammit  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:31 AM   #44 
                    - "Again, who didn't want to continue letting inspections work in Iraq?"  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:40 AM   #48 
                       - That makes no sense  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 03:07 AM   #52 
                          - You're right Sand  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 03:32 AM   #55 
  - Does this elevate your candidate as you tear John down?  bigtree   Jan-26-04 01:58 AM   #28 
  - sucks being the front runner  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:09 AM   #31 
     - Bring it on. n/t  sandnsea   Jan-26-04 02:14 AM   #34 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-26-04 02:25 AM   #39 
        - lol  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:26 AM   #40 
  - I see why you didn't provide a link--it's from a right-wing source:  jchild   Jan-26-04 02:49 AM   #49 
  - Kerry provided it though  Forkboy   Jan-26-04 02:57 AM   #51 
     - It's not an accurate quotation with the ellipses  jchild   Jan-26-04 03:11 AM   #53 
  - I wouldn't give Saddam Hussein a nuclear weapon  isbister   Jan-26-04 03:11 AM   #54 
  - Locking  Moderator   Jan-26-04 05:29 AM   #57 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC