Based on how the court voted today and who voted for and against New London, the pukes will DEMAND a right-wing judge be appointed. The court is a disgrace IMO.
New London:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/23/politics/23wire-scotus.html?ei=5094&en=5036788eb4cc9d17&hp=&ex=1119585600&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1119539227-4Cp7XKcYiCeHmHtkVM9DZATigerd:
http://www.library.reed.edu/courses/syllabi/econ371/DolanvTigard.pdfOn edit... Dolan v. Tigerd was a case in the 90s were the court decided against Tigert, OR when they required a dedication of bike path. Not a seizure of all of the plaintiffs land for a corporate give-away, just a small portion of the property as part of the development process to be dedicated to a legitimate public purpose.
No to dedication for bike path, yes to seizure for corporate give-away.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
