Reply #4: You mean CLINTON'S "Iraq Liberation Act".

[LynnTheDem]

Which had and has no standing in law coz under US law and the United States Constitution, "regime change" is in fact ILLEGAL.

And read the ACTUAL authority to wage war; NOWHERE does it say bush has authority to wage war to SPREAD DEMOCRACY.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

Huh. So where's the "(3) to spread democracy" ?

Nope. It was all based on a non-existant THREAT from Iraq. Good. The Hague should deal with that.