You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Great analysis clear eye -- it really is all about the oil/natural gas [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Great analysis clear eye -- it really is all about the oil/natural gas
This is starting to remind me of Cheney's 2001 energy task force. We've heard a lot about the possibility they were cooking up plans for Iraq -- but were they including Alaska as well?

I've been puzzling over the stakes in the Alaska natural gas pipeline issue. A Newsweek article from June (http://www.newsweek.com/id/139335/output/print) indicates that Palin has been promoting the TransCanada pipeline plan -- which is opposed by the big oil companies -- as part of an attempt to force the oil companies to execute their natural gas leases, which they've been sitting on for 30 years.

This is how she got the maverick reputation that McCain has been touting -- but it seems like the unlikeliest thing in the world for her to be an actual maverick, so I've been wondering whose interests she's really serving.

That's why it makes so much sense to see Cheney's hand in the deal. Cheney may be an oilman, but he isn't really on the side of the big oil companies. He's far more interested in creating Fortress America -- and getting those Alaskan natural gas reserves to market would plausibly matter more to him than the profits of BP and ConocoPhillips.

But that would also mean, as I take you to be saying, that Cheney is the real hand behind the McCain campaign -- and that is both enlightening and scary.

It also suggests that the recent investigations of Ted Stevens and other corrupt Alaskan political figures might not be a matter of good government rearing its head but something more in the nature of a coup -- like some third world government which is corrupt but protective of local interests being overthrown by outside forces in the guise of reformers.

But then how do you see the Rove interest in the Gulf Coast states as fitting in? Is that ultimately about, say, offshore drilling and not just about creating a cheap-labor power base in the Deep South?

I've been very aware of the geostrategic approach in Central Asia as it applies to US meddling with Caspian oil, pipeline routes, and the invasion of Iraq and confrontation with Iran. But it never occurred to me before that the geostrategists might also have been mapping out the US and its energy reserves and potential pipeline routes with an eye to asserting control here at home. You've given me a lot to think about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC