You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #37: Ha! How ironic. Wouldnt' Matthews' framing it that way, itself, be passive aggressive. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

krkaufman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jan-31-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10

37. Ha! How ironic. Wouldnt' Matthews' framing it that way, itself, be passive aggressive.

Framing it as "others are saying..." ... rather than being either objective, or owning the statement, himself?

Did "NOW" say this, or was it one of the state branches? e.g. The NY branch put out an unbelievably sexist rant deriding Ted Kennedy for having the temerity not to put his support behind a female candidate, regardless of the candidates' positions. The NOW national org, however, endorsed Clinton while managing not to deride Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.