Reply #32: um....Clinton or Obama?

[mrbluto]

Clinton or Obama?

...once this part of the process is all over, is ensure we have a President Clinton or a President Obama taking the oath of office next January 20.

Really?

Let's read that again:

...once this part of the process is all over, is ensure we have a President Clinton or a President Obama taking the oath of office next January 20.

Is that my choice?

The main stream media suggests that's the case.

And now so are you.

Hmmmmmm.

The MSM spin is so obvious it's like playing a puzzle on one of the place mats they put out for the kids at Waffle House or IHoP - here are two pictures A & B, they look alike, but things are missing in B, which ones kids?

Want to play?

Only in this case picture A is a reality, the reality, where class warfare is in full swing, our government spies on us and tortures captives, where ought have a full debate that addresses those issues, and picture B is a reality, merely one of many realities offered, that you and the mainstream media present where there's a fantastic opportunity to make strides in either race OR gender issues.

One or the other - but NOT THAT ONE!

When the enemy (the corporate owned media) offers me a choice and tries to hide the third valid choice under the counter - which do you think we should pick?

BTW: After closely reading your post I am fairly certain at least one "Clown" has de-cloaked.

I think your post does it's little bit to ensure what you suggest:

...ensure we have a President Clinton or a President Obama...

Too bad that's an result the corporate republicans who caused the current mess, while not loving that outcome, are quite comfortable with.