You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #34: No, using the term "holocaust" to describe a legal medical procedure that in no
[View All]
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-20-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. No, using the term "holocaust" to describe a legal medical procedure that in no |
|
conceivable way could ever equal the deliberate mass extermination of an entire race IS a problem. Maybe not for fire-and-brimstone Sunday preachers and pro-life activists, but for Presidential candidates? It's offensive. That kind of discourse is wildly inappropriate--it's like he forgot he wasn't in the pulpit. Scary. Other problems--blaming immigration on abortion (huh???) and holding up the "word of God" as somehow co-equal to the Constitution in terms of law. The dude's off his rocker.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread