"There Is No Difference Between Gore & Bush" - Ralph Nader, October 2000

[THUNDER HANDS]

"There is no difference between Kerry & Bush" - DU, January 2004

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Four years later, two wars later, thousands of dead Americans later, millions of lost jobs later people are still saying that the person running against Bush is no better than him.

Can someone with a little logic and common sense please tell me why, four years after, we're still having this same argument?

I guess it's true what they say about liberals. Ask them to form a firing squad and they line up in a circle.

Aren't we supposed to LEARN from experience?