You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #76: Her post seemed to imply that making money in the private sector [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Her post seemed to imply that making money in the private sector
is the equivalent of "feathering ones own nest", even though it is public record that men like Clark and Gore are also doing unpaid political work on the behalf of the Democratic Party and various issues of public concern. Further her comment was made in the context of activities that should weigh against someone being worthy of receiving support as a potential Presidential candidate. Correct me if I am wrong but that was my read. And if it was my read, than likely it was other's also.

My post questioned those conclusions and noted that the accusation of "feathering ones own nest" when made on DU seems to be exclusively applied to Wesley Clark's activities, which is at best inconsistent and at worst disingenuous. Many here are promoting Al Gore for President in 2008 yet none accuse him of "feathering his own nest" with paid corporate connections.

I went to great pains in my original post to do two things. One is I clearly separated out the two issues that Julie raised in her first post; one concerning having been elected to public office before, and the other currently making money in the private sector. I acknowledged that Gore has held high elective offices, and I acknowledged that the fact that Clark hasn't is a valid topic for discussion. But I strongly believe that no one can deny that both men have devoted long lives to public service and should be equated in that regard. In that specific regard, as Chrunchy noted above, it is apples to apples.

The second point that I clearly made is that I greatly respect Gore (and obviously Clark also), and that I see absolutely no reason why Gore's current corporate activities should be held against him. No one is attacking Gore in that regard as far as I know and I'm certainly not doing so, but Clark does get attacked in that regard, and it seems to be a matter of selective targeted concern regarding Clark, with a free pass to anyone else. I thought that point was well illustrated by noting Gore's activities in this context.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC