Reply #64: You studiously avoided answering my question.

[mhatrw]

I've read the NIST reports. That's why I'm so puzzled.

Where is the physical evidence for these history making (in area and damage wrought for pre-collapse and temperature for post-collapse) WTC fires? There is no physical examination of molten metal from the WTC mentioned in NIST's reports, and almost no hard evidence that any WTC metal was heated over even 200 C.

Considering the unique and history making phenomena that occurred in these WTC fires, why wasn't a comprehensive forensic examination of the physical rubble performed? Please explain. If you think I'm mistaken, please cite any scientific reports that specify the analysis of WTC rubble that was heated over 200 C. How many NIST examined pieces of WTC rubble showed any physical evidence of being heated that much? What further scientific analyses of these pieces were made?