You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #73: re:189 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
demodewd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #68
73. re:189
The 189 figure includes the passengers and crew as well as the Pentagon personel. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -It Was Flight 77 crispy  Feb-13-04 02:32 PM   #0 
  - dammit  crispy   Feb-13-04 02:38 PM   #1 
  - No  DulceDecorum   Feb-13-04 08:21 PM   #2 
     - let crispy himself rebut this reply from eastman  dick_eastman   Feb-25-04 05:01 PM   #101 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-25-04 07:39 PM   #102 
        - Response  crispy   Feb-27-04 11:21 AM   #103 
           - Anyone?  crispy   Mar-01-04 09:53 PM   #105 
              - ANOTHER THREAD  DulceDecorum   Mar-03-04 03:41 PM   #106 
                 - Slicing Crispy to ribbons???? LOLOLOL  boloboffin   Mar-03-04 05:08 PM   #107 
                 - So what about the other thread?  boloboffin   Mar-14-04 01:47 PM   #108 
  - Maybe one day I will...  JackRiddler   Feb-14-04 12:12 AM   #3 
  - You're wasting your time.  mn9driver   Feb-14-04 08:21 AM   #4 
  - Attn: Official Story Conspiracy spokesperson:  Abe Linkman   Feb-14-04 02:47 PM   #5 
  - Gotta "hand" it to ya  crispy   Feb-14-04 09:25 PM   #6 
  - "crispy" was no help. Would someone pls. read THIS...  Abe Linkman   Feb-14-04 09:54 PM   #7 
  - Yeah, me too  BeFree   Feb-14-04 11:23 PM   #9 
  - Some wreckage photos at this link.  mn9driver   Feb-14-04 11:58 PM   #10 
  - Those pieces of "wreckage"  DulceDecorum   Feb-15-04 02:42 PM   #23 
     - Can you provide a more direct link that states this  LARED   Feb-15-04 03:08 PM   #24 
     - (Sigh) What did I tell you, crispy?  mn9driver   Feb-15-04 03:43 PM   #27 
        - There is NO documentation  DulceDecorum   Feb-16-04 09:45 AM   #37 
           - Off we go...into the wild blue yonder....you crack me up, Dulce.  mn9driver   Feb-16-04 09:51 AM   #38 
              - How about just a little explaining where you feel DD is wrong?  Abe Linkman   Feb-16-04 10:43 AM   #39 
              - No. I meant I won't. I do have 5 minutes, though, so  mn9driver   Feb-16-04 11:46 AM   #42 
                 - Have you seen what FEDERAL LAW  DulceDecorum   Feb-16-04 01:47 PM   #48 
                 - There's a difference between N number registration  mn9driver   Feb-16-04 04:20 PM   #52 
                    - Since you brought up  DulceDecorum   Feb-17-04 01:30 PM   #57 
                       - AD's, STC's as Airworthiness Cert.'s? The problem w/the Web, DD  mn9driver   Feb-17-04 04:31 PM   #61 
                          - How do you think I'm going to get along  DulceDecorum   Feb-17-04 10:38 PM   #63 
                 - About those "expiring" UA registrations  DulceDecorum   Feb-18-04 07:05 PM   #65 
              - FACT  DulceDecorum   Feb-16-04 12:50 PM   #44 
              - And these facts are  LARED   Feb-16-04 01:14 PM   #45 
              - That is nonsense. I explained the medical certification issue  mn9driver   Feb-16-04 04:25 PM   #53 
                 - Tell that to the FAA  DulceDecorum   Feb-17-04 12:56 PM   #56 
                    - You dont seem able to take in new information, DD.  mn9driver   Feb-17-04 03:14 PM   #59 
                       - Fantasies?  DulceDecorum   Feb-17-04 10:23 PM   #62 
              - De-registered Aircraft  DulceDecorum   Feb-16-04 01:32 PM   #46 
                 - Which part of  LARED   Feb-16-04 02:28 PM   #51 
                 - Are you really unable to tell the difference between  mn9driver   Feb-16-04 08:10 PM   #54 
                    - Is that your final answer?  DulceDecorum   Feb-17-04 01:55 PM   #58 
                       - Refer to #59  mn9driver   Feb-17-04 03:14 PM   #60 
  - NSF did a study  Robb   Feb-15-04 12:52 PM   #17 
     - NSF did not do the Study  impe   Feb-17-04 08:54 AM   #55 
        - None of this has been investigated....that's what Families of  mac2   Mar-01-04 08:57 AM   #104 
  - You're right to bring this up  JackRiddler   Feb-15-04 05:46 PM   #33 
     - Speak for yourself, John Alden.  Abe Linkman   Feb-16-04 10:44 AM   #40 
  - Several people  DulceDecorum   Feb-14-04 10:16 PM   #8 
     - Yes,Yes, Yes  LARED   Feb-15-04 07:27 AM   #12 
  - Here's two  LARED   Feb-15-04 07:21 AM   #11 
     - Is that all??  BeFree   Feb-15-04 10:41 AM   #13 
     - We need  crispy   Feb-15-04 11:29 AM   #14 
     - You will be waiting a loooooooong time  LARED   Feb-15-04 12:04 PM   #15 
        - Still Waiting  BeFree   Feb-15-04 12:45 PM   #16 
           - You're mixed up about Ameircan justice  LARED   Feb-15-04 01:39 PM   #20 
              - So, ya think there was no crime?  BeFree   Feb-15-04 02:28 PM   #21 
              - Of course there was a crime  LARED   Feb-15-04 03:15 PM   #25 
                 - Proof  BeFree   Feb-15-04 03:43 PM   #26 
                    - No, I stated my opinion already  LARED   Feb-15-04 04:27 PM   #29 
                       - No cover-up of the evidence?  BeFree   Feb-15-04 04:36 PM   # 
                       - How about you answer  LARED   Feb-16-04 05:49 AM   #34 
                       - What incompetence are you talking about?  Abe Linkman   Feb-15-04 04:38 PM   #31 
                          - see 34 n/t  LARED   Feb-16-04 05:50 AM   #35 
              - You need to prove a lot more than that  TrogL   Feb-15-04 02:33 PM   #22 
                 - Thanks. Trogl  BeFree   Feb-15-04 03:58 PM   #28 
     - I don't buy your crash claim. Now; about the Pentagon recovery efforts.  Abe Linkman   Feb-15-04 12:53 PM   #18 
     - And what you have provided sounds like  LARED   Feb-15-04 01:36 PM   #19 
        - YOU believe (and sell) whatever nonsense YOU choose.  Abe Linkman   Feb-15-04 04:45 PM   #32 
           - Well  LARED   Feb-16-04 05:53 AM   #36 
              - Yessir. Salespeople of all stripes are welcome at DU.  Abe Linkman   Feb-16-04 10:48 AM   #41 
     - Well done, sir  HarryLime   Feb-19-04 06:16 PM   #78 
     - How do we know the tissue samples came fom both sites  JellyBean1   Feb-23-04 01:16 PM   #99 
  - ## Support Democratic Underground! ##  DU GrovelBot   Feb-15-04 04:36 PM   #30 
  - Alternative scenario  demodewd   Feb-16-04 12:30 PM   #43 
  - All the flights  DulceDecorum   Feb-16-04 01:36 PM   #47 
  - doubt  demodewd   Feb-16-04 02:28 PM   #50 
  - Let me see if I understand  LARED   Feb-16-04 02:23 PM   #49 
  - Heeheehee...funny :)  MercutioATC   Feb-17-04 11:40 PM   #64 
     - decoy  demodewd   Feb-18-04 07:44 PM   #66 
     - Double decoy?  DulceDecorum   Feb-18-04 08:22 PM   #68 
     - re:189  demodewd   Feb-19-04 11:49 AM   #73 
        - ALL the other numbers  DulceDecorum   Feb-19-04 02:48 PM   #74 
     - Stealthy decoy...nobody saw a return...  MercutioATC   Feb-18-04 09:26 PM   #71 
        - Nobody COULD see.  DulceDecorum   Feb-20-04 05:15 PM   #80 
           - Excellent question, DD. (why cut off transmissions but allow calls)  Abe Linkman   Feb-20-04 07:51 PM   #81 
           - This isn't an "official" response.  mn9driver   Feb-21-04 12:52 PM   # 
           - This isn't an "official" response.  mn9driver   Feb-21-04 12:52 PM   #83 
           - With no transponder, we lose a lot of data, but we CAN see a raw radar  MercutioATC   Feb-20-04 09:15 PM   #82 
              - planned?  k-robjoe   Feb-21-04 01:38 PM   #84 
                 - As far as I know, it wasn't "lost from radar", although laypersons like  MercutioATC   Feb-21-04 11:14 PM   #85 
                    - Re: "not" lost from radar  DulceDecorum   Feb-22-04 12:32 AM   #86 
                       - And, once again, we have an issue created by technical language, not fact.  MercutioATC   Feb-22-04 01:17 AM   #87 
                          - Technical diversions from Wherdy Go on 9-11  Abe Linkman   Feb-22-04 09:11 AM   #88 
                          - You really like that "Whacky cave man" line, don't you?  MercutioATC   Feb-22-04 12:03 PM   #91 
                             - "Wacky Cave Man" is Abe's last line of defense  boloboffin   Feb-22-04 06:45 PM   #92 
                             - "Wacky Cave Man Did It" theory best describes what is being "sold"...  Abe Linkman   Feb-22-04 06:59 PM   #93 
                                - QED  boloboffin   Feb-22-04 10:34 PM   #95 
                                   - Is that "Rendon Group" talk or something else?  Abe Linkman   Feb-22-04 11:19 PM   #96 
                                      - Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum)  boloboffin   Feb-23-04 01:49 PM   #100 
                             - Having aviation professionals responding to posts  mn9driver   Feb-22-04 09:18 PM   #94 
                          - haven´t seen  k-robjoe   Feb-22-04 11:22 AM   #89 
                             - I wasn't there. I don't know that it didn't. I just know that the terms  MercutioATC   Feb-22-04 11:54 AM   #90 
                                - reappear  k-robjoe   Feb-23-04 03:20 AM   #97 
                                   - identify  k-robjoe   Feb-23-04 08:04 AM   #98 
     - Are you referring to the "Wacky Cave Man Did It" Conspiracy?  Abe Linkman   Feb-18-04 08:09 PM   #67 
        - Nope, the "decoy and poison gas" theory. It just doesn't work.  MercutioATC   Feb-18-04 09:41 PM   #72 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-18-04 08:34 PM   #69 
  - A waste of OUR money  DulceDecorum   Feb-18-04 09:07 PM   #70 
  - Nobody has noticed this & why?  nomatrix   Feb-19-04 03:24 PM   #75 
     - Chuckie-pooh  DulceDecorum   Feb-19-04 04:23 PM   #76 
        - No pooh, piglet, or Eeyore  nomatrix   Feb-19-04 05:31 PM   #77 
           - JS/07/M/378/  DulceDecorum   Feb-20-04 01:11 PM   #79 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC