Reply #80: I condensed my explanation to fit the subject line. Try "anything useful".

[Make7]

I thought since the point had already been made, you would understand that I was referring to the "object" which you believe is shown to be too small in the picture. In light of the question of yours in the post to which I responded, I believed that the meaning of my reply would be sufficiently clear. Apparently I was incorrect in that assumption.

To clarify, here is one example of my previous statements:

"There is nowhere near an adequate amount of resolution within that particular picture to determine the dimensions of the 'object' in question."

You did not seem to acknowledge this argument when it was presented before, therefore I see very little reason to believe that you will recognize the obvious deficiencies in trying to use that picture to analyze the "object" to which you have been referring.

- Make7