Reply #119: but that is the point.

[QuietStorm]

It seems there is question as to the authenticity of the series of photos. My question would be (even though I was impressed by Eastman's explanation regarding the missile stream). IF these series of photos have been completely doctored or even somewhat doctored one could argue that this stream you focus on was manipulated even incidentally when the doctoring of the video pics took place. If that is so all this time is being spent on a missile stream that while it might have been present, it might have repixelated during doctoring, which would than have altered it from it's original state.

Do you see what I mean? And again I do remember reading through back several months go arguments on missile streams that never seemed to pan one way or the other. This too is rehash to some extent. There has to be a more productive way to proceed with investigations. I don't mind review and rehash if there is a reason to review the matter.

In this case where the full authencity of the photo is questioned, and it seems it has yet not been established whether the photos ARE INDEED authentic, it would seem to me that time would be best spent on another aspect of the Pentagon investigation that poses questions or suspicions.

Like the points I have now raised several times to which only one person has responded (and that was via PM).