Reply #112: Benfea

[Bouvet_Island]

"How could the conspirators (who are the same incompetents who brought us the Iraq occupation and the Katrina response) have done this to the inside of the WTC without any of the thousands of office workers already in the building noticing?"

Then what you are saying that it is possible to accomplish exactly the same, almost better without any such preparation but putting a hole in one of the load bearing structures and heating that area.

With drawings and expertize and years of planning, why couldn't someone decide that this building would only need a little help here and there to come down?

Your argument is actually of exactly the same construction as the bad part of this forum, you hold up both ignorance, speculation, personal attacks and arrogance as good debate technique. Who learnt you this?

I frankly don't know what happened but I doubt you even know any particle physics, there is just nothing scientific about a fella that firmly believes he doesn't have to read a text before discussing it.

Your generalisation are not much different from blaiming "muslims" for 9/11, if you believe in allah you believe jews control all media and that holocaust is fake etc. Not all those videos are the same, one of the good ones was made by European fellas and had former goverment members analyze the events based on only official sources, and it is just really clear that the bush administration version of events doesn't even work within their own official reports. The 9/11 report says in plain text that it isn't very interesting where the operation got its funding.

Some of your observations about the methods of the "truth movement" though are probably correct, but I haven't seen a single ufo reference in any 9-11 related page or thread here even some people have a little high expectations of the current state of technology. You on the other hand have to little, to sum it up:

Go to moon - > easy
make building fall down with explosives, not fall over and place them discreetely - > impossible.

I don't have the truth, but you are not making a very good case for your version that seems to be fact challenged.