Reply #53: Many excellent references to contradict the official "story"

[Straight Shooter]

Certainly one of the most compelling videos I've seen yet. No burns on the Pentagon lawn. No debris sufficient to uphold the claim. I have to admit I was shocked to learn that the pilot of the Boeing which crashed into the Pentagon was also, one year prior, involved in understanding how an attack on the Pentagon with a Boeing could take place. That's just downright creepy. There are no coincidences in life that come so close to such irony, without requiring further scrutiny.

I was also impressed with the Maryland flight instructor school operator. The entire time, almost, he had a half-smile during the interview as if to say, "I know something but cannot say it." Didn't really look at the camera, either. Sure would like to be a wall on the fly of his office when he's talking to himself about September 11 and the hijacker who "flew" the Boeing into the Pentagon.

Why is it that people can create fact-based videos which contradict the official story, but no one has yet to create a convincing video that supports the official story, including eyewitness accounts and explanations of how the forensic evidence defies physics and logic. Makes you wonder ...