Reply #75: What's dogmatic is the assertion that there is "no evidence whatsoever"

[plaguepuppy]

And again, I am not trying to re-argue the whole issue, not trying to disrespect the various eyewitnesses, etc. I'm just stating a fact, apart from what other lines of evidence might or might not show, and apart from the emotional attachment to the events.

The fact is that I don't see anything in that picture that makes me believe that a plane hit the Pentagon, based on the merits of the picture itself. Not based on someone's post-hoc explanation of why it doesn't show what it seems to show, or someone's emotional reaction to what it might imply. Unless we judge each individual piece of evidence by those standards the composite picture we arrive at has no chance of being correct.

Misplaced irony alert:

"On the other hand the only guys making dogmatic claims are the guys without evidence or proof or anything for that matter."

This is just a slight restatement of your usual dogmatic claim that there exists no evidence for any views not in agreement with yours. If that were really true I don't think these threads would have gone on for as long as they have, unless we believe your implicit claim that everyone who disagrees with you is a liar and/or fool.