Reply #59: Rabid dogma alert !

[plaguepuppy]

Sure you're not being just a tad dogmatic there old buddy?

I think this is called "PROOF BY ASSERTION IN ALL CAPS":

"There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that something other than flt 77 hit the Pentagon.

The IS PLENTY OF EVIDENCE that flt 77 did hit the Pentagon.

There is NO EVIDENCE that flt 77 did not hit the Pentagon.

So what do you have. Nothing, but pure speculation. "

Yes there you have it - all the evidence that doesn't fit just disappears with a wave of the caps lock key. None of this messy refutation of specifics, just claim none of it exists. And heck, if there's no evidence, then all that's left is speculation. QED!

Sorry, but my keyboard doesn't have that function...


And despite your alarmist response, all I really said was that I cannot in good conscience look at those pictures of the initial damage and say that I believe a passenger jet hit that building. I still don't. You're welcome to try to convince me otherwise, but don't pretend the damn picture doesn't exist,
or that an intelligent and well-intentioned individual (yup, that's me!) could look at it and have a hard time believing that claim.