Reply #14: Who supports holograms? No one on this board.

[demodewd]

A very small small minority of "researchers" even fathom the possibility of holograms.Obviously if there was an anomoly on the underside of the plane the plane was not a hologram. Apples and oranges,and yet you tie the two ideas together.

You would need more than a "grain of dust" to identify explosives in a scientifically controlled inquiry. Besides there is the option of microwave technology which might explain the end of collapse afterglow of both WTC1 and WTC2 but not present in the end of collapse of WTC7. Wonder why? Two different types of explosions? I refer you to http://www.kpfa.org/archives/archives.php?id=13&limit=N Please if you will, listen to the December 15th archive with Jim Hoffman.

A gravitational collapse explains the extreme heat of rubble pile,and the massive dust clouds and their amazing speed through Lower Manhattan? Gravitational collapses pulverize cement and gypsum to particles smaller in width to that of a blade of hair throughout the entire collapse?