If you asked a dozen neutral observers to read the NIST analysis and state what it "revolved around," I suspect that several -- possibly most -- of them would ask you what the question meant. I'm not sure that any would say that it revolved around sagging floors.
Why am I stubbornly contesting your point? Because I don't think it makes much sense.
Does it have any bearing on your engineering analysis? Do you deny that the floors sagged and pulled the perimeter columns inward?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
