Reply #17: The questions that really bug me about CD theories are...

[William Seger]

1) Who would possibly plan such an operation with any expectation of getting away it? Just a simple example, what if the dog just happened to get near the truck and go nuts?

2) Who would possible go around to all the people who would need to be involved and say, "Hey, the Prez really needs your help. We're gonna blow up the WTC and make it look like a terrorist attack?"

3) How many people would you expect to go along with that plan, or at least not mention that they had been approached? If you were one of them, and even if you were one who would literally do anything to help the Prez, wouldn't you consider the consequences if the whole crackpot scheme were to go wrong?

Even if we start with an assumption that Neocons wanted a "false flag" attack, why would they pick something so incredibly complicated and risky -- in terms of failing and getting caught -- when it's trivial to think of schemes that they could have very safely pulled off with just a couple of "black ops" guys? Don't you think that when someone proposes a theory that doesn't even register on the Plausibility Meter, they ought to have some pretty convincing evidence?