|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-22-09 08:58 AM Original message |
For your enlightenment |
Advertisements [?]
111 Reasons Why I Am a No-Planer
1) The dearth of plane debris at all of the four crash sites 2) No matching of debris found with actual official planes via serial numbers 3) Not one tail section found or observed from the four crashes though tails survive all crashes 4) No wing tips breaking off in 2nd hit videos 5) No broken off wing tip sections photographed or reported being recovered 6) Not one of hundreds of metal seat frames from the planes photographed or reported being recovered 7) None of four black boxes recovered from ground zero, officially 8) Initial eyewitnesses to the south tower hit described a missile 9) The lack of deceleration as “UA175” goes into the south tower 10) The lack of significant deflected debris as “UA175” goes into the south tower 11) The lack of anything clearly breaking off the plane as “UA175” goes into the south tower 12) Discontinuous dust cloud pattern from “UA175” as it goes in the tower in the Hezarkhani video 13) The lack of any alteration in the course of “UA175” as it goes in the tower 14) The impossible behavior of “UA175” acting indestructible as it goes in the tower then shattering to bits once inside the tower 15) The lack of any explosion as the fuel-filled wings of “UA175” make impact with the thick steel columns of WTC2 16) The lack of any significant fire from the port wing of “UA175” 17) The explosions on tower façade away from impact site as “UA175” goes into the south tower 18) The abnormally large explosions produced by wingtips as “UA175” goes into the south tower 19) The way the wings of “UA175” initially slice into the tower in videos, cleanly with no deflected debris, with an unnatural straight edge along the spot of entry 20) The strange tube-like explosion that appears under the fuselage of “UA175” in the Hezarkhani video 21) Parts of the south tower hole become larger after plane has already passed through 22) The south tower hole is completely blocked by debris and broken columns, which contrasts the way the plane slips into tower without slowing or breaking up on video 23) The discrepancy in engine puffs (above wing versus below wing) between Fairbanks and Hezarkhani videos 24) Plane path discrepancies in different 2nd hit videos 25) Odd coloring/tinting in several 2nd hit videos 26) The readily available technology to insert digital objects, such as planes, into video (for instance see Ace Baker’s work) 27) The ability of the blue sky on 9/11 to act as natural blue screen 28) Live shot of 2nd hit is same camera feed for CNN, ABC, Fox—they all showed helicopter shot at same key moment 29) In live shot of 2nd hit, camera man “taken by surprise” by plane—plane suddenly enters frame—cameraman apparently not able to see plane approaching 30) Initial 2nd hit videos, particularly live shot, only show indirect view of tower hit; don’t see videos with plane going directly into tower until much later 31) Fox5 side-view shot of plane replayed on CNN, talking heads refer to plane going through the building, but view of plane is cut off by large banner at bottom of screen 32) Both the ABC/CNN/Fox live shot and the Fox5 shots of the 2nd hit have blackouts right after the explosion starts 33) Michael Hezarkhani not allowed to talk about his video by CNN 34) Michael Hezarkhani’s amazing ability to pan at the speed of a plane coming over his head from behind 35) The inconsistent story of where Michael Hezarkhani filmed his video 36) The bad acting/over acting of the voices in the “black plane” video 37) Frames of the black plane video appearing as Robert Clark photos 38) The Manos video where the woman rants about suicide bombers as the 2nd hit occurs and where the videographer also has a video of him and friends “sneaking” into Area 51 39) The Park Foreman video initially appearing as photo frames on CNN 40) Suspicious history of CameraPlanet, where many amateur videos appeared 41) The CBS video from the north where the plane comes in at a blatantly wrong angle to hit the tower, disappears behind the tower, then the explosion 42) The odd similarity of the Naka Nathtaniel and Park Foreman videos—in particular the same panning motion in both 43) Clear discrepancy in the Anthony Cotsifas photo with the position of the 2nd plane with 2nd hit videos 44) The inconsistent story of Evan Fairbanks and his video 45) Evan Fairbanks’ alluding to his video being unreal 46) The cartoon-like quality of the plane image in several second hit videos 47) The airframe anomalies in the plane in most 2nd hit videos 48) The fact that high resolution videos of the second hit have not been released 49) The fact that no one has taken up Ace Baker’s challenge for $100,000 for an original amateur 2nd hit video 50) David Handschuh (and others, e.g. Victor Cruzate) not seeing the plane despite being in position to see it 51) Many putative 2nd plane witnesses, when analyzed carefully, only saw the explosion or saw the whole thing only on TV 52) Several extremely improbable photos of “UA175” right before impact 53) The laughable Moshe Bursuker photo of the plane half in the south tower 54) Kathy Cacicedo, who saw the WTC from the southwest, saying the plane banked around the side of the tower—indicating a fly-by 55) Plane is smaller than should be in some 2nd hit videos, indicating a fly-by or flawed video fakery 56) The “white elephant” plane that Diane Sawyer referred to as circling by the WTC before the 2nd hit 57) The lack of official explanation for the “white elephant” plane 58) The fact that Reynolds Dixon, who wrote a paper for a 9/11 journal on the “white elephant” plane, complained of harassment and suddenly left the movement. 59) The endless replaying of the 2nd hit videos on the networks, a form of brainwashing 60) The plane-shaped holes—at all four crash sites—that defy physics 61) The ridiculous absence of debris at the Shanksville crater 62) The conflicting accounts of how much of flight 93 went into the ground 63) The conflicting accounts of how much of the flight 93 plane was recovered 64) The lies about the phone calls on flight 93 65) The wing marks in the Shanksville crater that contradict an inverted Boeing 757 crash 66) The ridiculously idea that amateur pilots flying 767s and 757s for the first time could pilot the planes with such precision at high speed 67) The fact that UA175 was exceeding maximum velocity for low altitude 68) The confusion of air defense systems and easy explanation by no planes 69) The 9/11 hijack drills had fake radar targets 70) Fake plane crashes mentioned as part of Operation Northwoods 71) The inconsistent story of Carmen Taylor; the picture of the burning WTC taken from NJ shown in her camera 72) Fake plane crashes add to the psy-op effect and test ability of system to fool the public 73) The incredible series of zoom-ins for the Fox5/WNYW video, with the cameraman seemingly oblivious to the plane but zooming in tight just in time to capture the 2nd hit 74) The miraculous zoom-ins/zoom-outs right before the plane strike in several 2nd hit videos 75) The blatant nose-out frames of the Fox5/WNYW video contradicting that the plane officially didn’t exit the tower 76) The blatant nose-out frames of the Fox5/WNYW video contradicting the lack of a major exit hole for the South tower 77) The two different edited versions of the Fox5/WNYW video that appeared 78) The fact that a few people who took videos of the second plane were professional video animators (Devin Clark, Luc Courchesne, Scott Myers, Naka Nathaniel) 79) WABC news chopper pilot, Paul Smith, who helped get WTC footage on 9/11 killed in freak accident 80) Inconsistent stories of WABC Cameraman John DelGiorno 81) Fox5 helicopter reporter Kai Simonsen, a green-screen expert 82) Devin Clark’s slip-up referring to “those fake videos” in his interview with Jeff (Pumpitout) Hill 83) The very very strange behavior of all other 9/11 plane witnesses and experts called by Jeff (Pumpitout) Hill 84) The pathetically unrealistic Purdue simulation of AA11 going into the north tower 85) The “curtain-chewer” hyperactive 2nd plane witness 86) The NYC 1st plane witnesses interviewed on TV who weren’t in a good position to see the plane or who were network executives or both 87) The very obscure history of many-- if not all—2nd hit videos 88) Peter Hanson’s fake-sounding phone call from flight 175 89) Inconsistent stories about engines landing around the WTC 90) The too obviously planted “plane debris” north of the WTC that no one can explain 91) The large engine fragment at Church and Murray, that ended up under a construction canopy on its end, without leaving a major impact crater. 92) The unlikelihood of the Naudets filming the 1st hit 93) The lack of similarity of the object in their 1st hit video to a Boeing 767 94) The curiously cut version of the Naudet’s 2nd hit video 95) The multiple pieces of plane debris that are clearly planted 96) The inconsistent story of Barbara Olson’s phone calls from flight 77 97) The fact that the official Pentagon-AA77 story violates aerodynamics as a 757 can’t fly a few feet off the ground at 500+ mph 98) The plane path contradictions in the Pentagon-AA77 story 99) The easy ability of “flight 77” to overfly the Pentagon and land at Reagan National 100) The delay in releasing the 2nd Pentagon security camera video 101) The strange lack of attention to the blurry object in the 2nd Pentagon security camera video 102) The conflicting accounts of how much of the flight 77 plane was recovered 103) The high preponderance of painted fuselage debris found on the Pentagon lawn 104) The curious Pentagon entry hole, with intact windows above 105) The round Pentagon “exit” hole 106) The aircraft nosecone being reported as being outside of the Pentagon “exit” hole 107) April Gallop’s Pentagon story 108) The discrepancy in aircraft debris blown backwards out of the entry hole at the Pentagon versus not at the WTC 109) The (initial) absence of AA11 and AA77 in the BTS database. 110) The lack of transmissions from any of the four flights indicating a hijacking. 111) The hysteria that greeted and still greets no-planers from so many in the controlled 9/11 truth movement In case you haven't been a regular reader of my blog for the past four years, all this stuff has been covered there in gory detail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC