Reply #55: For those who missed

[RH]

the abundance of previous DU threads about the Pentagon:

1. The entry hole into the Pentagon was not significantly smaller than the fuselage of an AA 757. This is perfectly possible to verify, and has been verified many times over. The dimensions of the Pentagon architecture are not a secret.

The hole and its trajectory are obviously not consitent with a missile. A missile would not possibly have felled five lamp poles with an implied wingspan of at least 90 feet, nor would a missile have moved a thirty ton electricity generator towards the building.

2. Every one of the recently renovated Pentagon blast resistant windows, nearly two inches thick, that were directly in line with the wings or fuselage of the aircraft was either broken or completely missing after impact. Parts of the stone wall were also damaged, consistent with the wingspan of a B757. A section of the ground floor wall about 90 feet wide was demolished by the impact, with steel columns missing.

3. Jetliner wreckage, body parts, seats, and other debris were most certainly evident to people at the scene, within the building and outside, even on and near to Washington Boulevard. An autopsy positively identified passengers. The Flight 77 Black Box Flight Recorder was recovered from the scene.

4. An abundance of personal witness accounts, exist. Hundreds of people saw the aircraft approach the Pentagon at tree top height. Dozens of people saw it hit the building. Not one person who was there to see for themselves is known to have any doubt that Flight 77 hit the building.

5. Not one person independent or otherwise saw a small fighter plane flying very low and shooting a missile into the Pentagon, or anything like it. The notion is a fiction.

6. The FBI is not a PR firm. The FBI gather evidence and the FBI is then responsible to keep the evidence. That is their job. Other people who say that a service station camera was pointed at the Pentagon do not in fact know what it was pointed at. Security cameras routinely focus upon an immediate vicinity, not the sky or distant buildings.

7. The Pentagon did not release 5 frames of a security video. It was not an official release and no original news story referred to it as a video. The notion that frames were missing is therefore a conjectural fabrication, not yet seen to be substantiated by anything at all.

8. The box was covered by blue tarp was being moved towards the Pentagon, not away from it. This is pefrectly evident from the photo in question, the location of which is. There is no reason whatsoever to suppose that it contained anything to be removed from the Pentagon. The notion that its contents were never revealed is a romantic fabrication. Debris removed from the Pentagon was moved in another direction, to the North Car Park.

9. The government has definitely not refused to disclose or show anyone the wreckage. Flight Attendant Carter who usually worked the Flight 77 route has signed a sworn affidavit to the effect that she did see wreckage, in situ at the Pentagon, recognisable as being from the airframe she knew.

There may be no end to the ignorant crap that would have us believe otherwise but you get the idea.

What a complete waste of time!

:boring: