Reply #17: There is a difference between weak and bad

[DrDebug]

The star wars program is weakly linked to 9/11, however bear in mind that TrailBlazer was one of the first steps in the Star Wars program, however it's importance in the overall program is vital, because without a Trans Orbital Positioning System (1) you cannot even begin an outer space program because all positioning system upto now are earth based. Since 20 December 2002, at 8pm Moscow Time (2) we now have a Trans Orbital Positioning System.

The reason which ties it in with 9/11 is that Trailblazer program was developed under the order of the National Reconnaissance Office, with sub contractor Booz Allen Hamilton and took partly place in the wing of the Pentagon, which was later officially hit by Flight 77. (3) On September 11th, Booz Allen Hamilton lost 3 employees in the Pentagon: Gerald Fisher, Terence Lynch, and Ernest Willcher. They apparently worked for the government on Trailblazer 1

James R. Clapper, a Booz, Allen, & Hamilton employee, leads the project, and at the same time develops new satellite capabilities and launced a "national security payload" (without any description) into space on September 8, 2001 at 8:25 a.m. (PDT) (7). But that's not all, because he also worked on a terror drill for Sept 11th 9 AM (EST), crashing planes into the headquarters, as later confirmed by NRO Officer John Fulton. (4)

The reason for its importance is that the PNAC (5) proposes to control the new international commons of space and cyberspace and pave the way for the creation of a new military service — U.S. Space Forces — with the mission of space control (6) and TrailBlazer can play a vital role in both.

So the TrailBlazer link is a weak link and can be better described as a subproject which was hidden during 9/11, there is a link between 9/11 and TrailBlazer and TrailBlazer literally paved the way for the future project to militarize outer space.

And how is it possible that the CIA "plane crash in building simulation" was coordinated by the same people who also worked on TrailBlazer, and whose offices were hit by an alleged incoming Flight 77? Why aren't we allowed to ask those questions? After all it's a bit weird, ain't it?

Sources:
1. http://www.spacenewsfeed.co.uk/2000/3September2000.html
2. http://www.transorbital.net/TB_TA.html (Too lazy to convert it to GMT or EST)
3. http://911review.org/inn.globalfreepress/AbuGhraib-Titan-911.html (Guess what a copy of the story is at 911review)
4. http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/cia-simulation.htm#ap
5. http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/PNAC_101
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
7. http://www.nro.gov/PressReleases/prs_rel53.html (Three days before 9/11!)