Reply #61: Well if

[John Q. Citizen]

NIST doesn't have evidence to prove thier hypothisis, it seems a little bit unreasonable that I would have evidence to prove my hypothisis, doesn't it? I mean they supposedly had access to the evidence, while of course I didn't.

Fema does have a piece of metal from WTC #7 that shows high temperature sufidation that they claim was exposed to temperatures approaching 1000 degrees C (1800 degrees F.)This is, of course, much hotter than diesel burns or office materials burn. So it is kind of a mystery, eh? Then there is also the mystery of persisitent hot spots (for weeks) at ground zero, molten metal observed by various people at ground zero, and of course the numerous eye-witness and audio recorded secondary explosions in the towers.

My hypothisis is that 9/11 is an inside job.

I base this hypothisis on the fact that Arab hijackers couldn't have taken out US air defenses for a two hour period on 9/11, on the fact that some of the hijackers lived with an FBI informant for a year and a half, and on the basic excepted approach to solving any crime;

Who had the motive?

Who had the means?

Who benefited?

(here's a hint, it wasn't the Arabs identified as the hijackers who had the motive, the means and who benefitted from the crime.)

If you would be interested in a couple of pretty good books you can read for free on various aspects of the 9/11 mystery, You can read Daniel Hopsicker's Welcome To Terrorland and/or Tarpley's Synthetic Terror, Made in the USThe Unofficial Biography of George H W bush Very well researched. Lots of good information.