Reply #47: Lets see what we have here

[LARED]

The coroner said

"I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop."

You restate this as

What does have to happen to a human body that not a single drop of blood is left?

No where does he say the body parts were bloodless. No where does he speak about whole bodies.

Yet it is clear the coroner believe there were bodies. There are numerous accounts of body parts found at the scene. People at the scene believe there was a plane, believe there were body parts.

The coroner does not say there was so blood at all, as if the parts were void of blood, only that he did not see drops. So, what does that mean? He saw no blood drops on non human parts? No blood splatter anywhere? You seem to be reading more into his statement than you should.

Perhaps he was embellishing a tad. Perhaps he did not see everything that was removed. The coroner said it was eerie, not that he was very surprised. We already know much of the plane burrowed into the ground. Perhaps that has something to do with it.

What I do know is this issue about the insignificant statement from the coroner is just an attempt to confuse the facts. You have already (before you understand what was said) framed this as some scientific quest of a phenomenon you think is real.

Maybe the hijackers were vampires. Maybe your questions are based on false argument?

Anyone want to place a bet?