Reply #20: I saw and still don't believe...

[hack89]

Same old superficial clap trap with absolutely no hard evidence. You realize the 9/11 CT community is doing the same thing as the Intelligent Design community - find holes in the opposing argument and using that as "proof" that they are right. ID fills gaps in scientific knowledge with God and says it proves ID while 9/11 CTrs fills the holes in the official story with conspiracy.

Proving the official story wrong does not automatically prove that you are right.

If it is so obvious, why has the 9/11 community failed to come to any consensus on what happened? Where are the timelines, physical evidence, names of participants? Why after four years can't they answer the simple question "tell me what really happened?". I am tired of endless questions and breathless announcements of "smoking guns" - why don't you lay out for me exactly what happened?