You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #130: Explosives after 1993 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
130. Explosives after 1993
There seem to be two theories: the 1993 planting and the Aug-Sep, 2001 planting.

Regarding the 1993 planting theory, that makes some sense. Officials could have been spooked by the narrow escape they encountered with the basement bombing. They may have concluded that an uncontrolled collapsed of the towers would have been horrendous -- even more catastrophic than the demolition that did occur on 9-11.

The down side of that theory is that there would be a certain danger in having the buildings pre-wired for explosion. On the other hand, this scenario certainly would explain why Silverstein seemed so casual when he made the comment that they decided to pull the building. If the buildings had been so wired since 1993, who would have known? Would Silverstein have known this? I guess the owner is entitled to know it.

The 2001 planting theory seems a lot more consistent with the idea of a greedy new owner looking for a way to make 7 billion bucks in a hurry, but logistically that seems a real tough nut.

If the 1993 theory is correct, it seems like the government would be motivated to come out with it because it would seem to exonerate them from charges of complicity with the terrorists. Their story could be, simply, "We made the decision to demolish the buildings. We regret the loss of life this caused, but had we allowed the buildings to collapse on their own, there would have been much greater loss of life."

This administration is so secretive -- well beyond the point of paranoia -- that they could never make such a disclosure. It is exactly the case of the plane that was evidently shot down in PA, yet the administration persists in telling the fairy tail of the heroic passengers who valiantly battled the terrorists until the bitter end.

But they have a point. A lot of Americans wouldn't really be too comfortable with the idea that the buildings they work in might be wired to implode at the touch of a button. Of course MANY MORE Americans would be horrified to learn that our government has been lying about this for 4 solid years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC