Reply #82: The official story doesn't explain much either.

[rman]

The cause of the collapse of WTC7 is unexplained by the official story (see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=48327&mesg_id=48640)

The pancake *theory* (supposedly) explaining the collapse of WTC 1 and 2, is proposed by a materials expert, not by a structural engineer, and that theory is highly contested by structural engineers.

I may not be qualified to explain what the government can not explain, but i am qualified to point out that the government can not explain it.
So although i do not exactly know what actually happened, for me the official story is enough ground for suspicion that something else happened then what the government wants us to believe.

The red flag for me is the fact that the government seems to be satisfied with, and seems to expect us to be satisfied with a story that does not explain shit.
Just look at the official motive for the attack; "they hate us for our freedoms". Give me a f'in break.

If you are interested to learn what allegedly has been omitted by the official investigation and the resulting report, have a look a this video recording from a non government-mandated 9-11 commission.
http://911busters.com/video/WMV/CC6_John_Judge_911_Omission_Report.wmv (wmv).
More:
http://911busters.com/911-Commission.html
http://www.reopen911.org/freedvd.php